Circumpolar star declination problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter trina1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Declination Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum declination for a star to be considered marginally circumpolar from the summit of Damavand Mountain in Iran. An observer at this location, with a latitude of 35° 57′ N, needs to account for the mountain's altitude when determining the star's declination. The initial calculations included determining the angle of dip based on the mountain's height and Earth's radius, resulting in an angle of 2 degrees 24 minutes. The correct approach to find the marginal declination involves subtracting this angle from the calculated declination of 54 degrees 3 minutes, leading to a final value of 56 degrees 27 minutes 9.06 seconds. The discussion concludes with the clarification that the angle of dip should be subtracted, allowing for a lower minimum declination.
trina1990
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
hi, heres' problem from an international olympiad

"The Damavand Mountain is located at the North part of Iran, in south coast of
Caspian Sea. Consider an observer standing on the Damavand mountaintop (latitude =
35° 57′ N; longitude = 52° 6' E; altitude 5.6 x 10^3m from the mean sea level) and looking at
the sky over the Caspian Sea. What is the minimum declination for a star, to be seen
marginally circumpolar for this observer. Geodetic radius of the Earth at this latitude
is 6370.8 km. Surface level of the Caspian Sea is approximately equal to the mean sea level."

i tried to walk through this problem this way...
the " angle of dip" or the angle subtended by the altitude to the horizon is
A= 57.3(root over) (2H/R) degree
where H=height of the mountain
R= radius of earth

i calculated A to be 2 degrees 24 minutes 9.06 seconds of arcs...

then i calculated the declination of the circumpolar star at this latitude from this formula,
declination>= ( 90 - latitude), so, dec=54 degrees 3minutes..

now to get the marginal declination for that altitude on the mountain top, should i add the "angle of dip" to this calculated declination? like declination=56 degrees 27 minutes 9.06 seconds...?

i need a verification to my calculation & if ther's any error please suggest me the right way to solve...please help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you subtract. On top of the mountain, you can see farther from Polaris, which means a lower minimum declination.
 
oki. . Got it. . Many many thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top