Calculating Circumpolar Star Declination for Different Latitudes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shaheen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the declination of circumpolar stars for observers in the Southern Hemisphere, specifically addressing the formula used and the interpretation of declination values in relation to latitude. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that for Northern Hemisphere observers, a circumpolar star must have a declination greater than 90 minus the observer's latitude, and questions how this applies to Southern Hemisphere observers.
  • Another participant proposes that the declination of the South Pole is -90, indicating that one could either use negative values for southern latitude or flip the sign in the equation to find the declination.
  • A subsequent post questions whether a star with a declination of -63 or -65 degrees would be considered circumpolar, seeking clarification on the conditions for circumpolarity.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the comparison of negative numbers and suggests that a star with a declination of -65 degrees is circumpolar, emphasizing the need to think in terms of proximity to -90 degrees.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to apply the formula for circumpolar stars in the Southern Hemisphere, with no consensus reached on the correct approach or interpretation of declination values.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about declination and latitude conversions, as well as the potential for confusion in interpreting negative values in the context of circumpolarity.

shaheen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Help appreciated in advance...

If one is in the NH, then a circumpolar star must have a declination greater than 90 - observer's latitude.

But if one is in the SH, what is the corrected formula? do we just convert their latitude to -ve (e.g. 26 South becomes -26) and/or do we change the sign of the equation above...

if we were asked the question:

Q) If an observer's latitude is 26 degrees south, find the declination of stars that are circumpolar to this observer.

How would one solve such a question
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Declination of the south pole is -90
so you could either take your southern latitide as -ve and use exactly the same equation

-90 - -26 = -64 or use positive values and flip the sign at the end, 90 - 26 = 64 => -64
 
so would that mean stars need to have a declination greater than/less than 64 degrees south.

i.e. would a star be circumpolar if its dec is -63 or -65?
 
Always confusing to talk about greater/less with negative numbers so let's say nearer -90, ie -65 is circumpolar
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K