Calculating Circumpolar Star Declination for Different Latitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaheen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
In the Southern Hemisphere, a circumpolar star must have a declination less than -90 degrees minus the observer's latitude. For an observer at 26 degrees south, the calculation can be approached by using either negative latitude or positive values with a sign flip. The declination of the South Pole is -90, leading to the equation -90 - (-26) = -64 or 90 - 26 = 64, resulting in -64. A star is considered circumpolar if its declination is greater than -65 degrees, meaning it must be closer to -90. This clarification helps in understanding the conditions for circumpolar stars in the Southern Hemisphere.
shaheen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Help appreciated in advance...

If one is in the NH, then a circumpolar star must have a declination greater than 90 - observer's latitude.

But if one is in the SH, what is the corrected formula? do we just convert their latitude to -ve (e.g. 26 South becomes -26) and/or do we change the sign of the equation above...

if we were asked the question:

Q) If an observer's latitude is 26 degrees south, find the declination of stars that are circumpolar to this observer.

How would one solve such a question
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Declination of the south pole is -90
so you could either take your southern latitide as -ve and use exactly the same equation

-90 - -26 = -64 or use positive values and flip the sign at the end, 90 - 26 = 64 => -64
 
so would that mean stars need to have a declination greater than/less than 64 degrees south.

i.e. would a star be circumpolar if its dec is -63 or -65?
 
Always confusing to talk about greater/less with negative numbers so let's say nearer -90, ie -65 is circumpolar
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top