Civil/Electrical Engg: Difference Between Traditional & Specializations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamranonline
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between traditional engineering fields and specialized areas, such as Electrical Engineering versus Electrical-Nano Engineering, and Civil Engineering versus Civil-Environmental Engineering. The initial poster expresses confusion about choosing a field, noting the lower GPA requirements for specialized programs and questioning whether specialization enhances job market opportunities. Responses emphasize that traditional engineering degrees, like Civil or Electrical Engineering, generally offer broader career prospects and are preferred by employers. It is suggested that students should consider starting with a traditional degree to maintain flexibility, allowing for specialization later through electives or graduate studies. The importance of aligning one's interests with the chosen field is also highlighted, with advice to focus on foundational engineering principles to ensure a well-rounded education.
kamranonline
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey! just have a quick question about the field of engineering. I am in undergrad first yr engg rite now. I am not really sure about the field I am going to choose yet but was just wondering if there is difference between traditional engineering and specialization. For instance, Electrical engineering and Electrical-nano engineering. They sounds to be the same field with one having emphasis on one particular aspect. If your are electrical-nano engineer, ur also electrical engineer so ur opportunities increases in the job market. isn't it? :S The entrance gpa for later one is 2.0 where as for the electrical engineering its 2.5 so I am confused abt the field. The same thing goes for Civil engineering (2.3) and Civil-Environmental engineering(2.0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kamranonline said:
Hey! just have a quick question about the field of engineering. I am in undergrad first yr engg rite now. I am not really sure about the field I am going to choose yet but was just wondering if there is difference between traditional engineering and specialization. For instance, Electrical engineering and Electrical-nano engineering. They sounds to be the same field with one having emphasis on one particular aspect. If your are electrical-nano engineer, ur also electrical engineer so ur opportunities increases in the job market. isn't it? :S The entrance gpa for later one is 2.0 where as for the electrical engineering its 2.5 so I am confused abt the field. The same thing goes for Civil engineering (2.3) and Civil-Environmental engineering(2.0).
Speaking as a Civil Engineer, by all means, unless you're determined to be an environmetal engineer or environmental scientist or specialist (I doubt that you know at this point), go for the Civil, which is all encompassing (Soils, structures, foundations, surveying, topgraphic layouts, environmental, etc.), and will lead you to more opportunities and advances in the job market (hence the greater gpa requirement). If after your second year you find stress analysis and the like difficult or boring, you can always then focus on the environmetal disciplines in your last 2 years. Regarding Electrical, the choice between Civil and Electrical will become easy after your second year. Generally, Electrical is the higher paying (and tougher) field of the 2, but that shouldn't be a factor if , for example, you like structure or environmental design, and despise voltage/current manipulations and silicon chips.
 
In my school you major as either Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, or Chemical. You can then get masters/doctorates in more specific fields such as Environmental.

The exception is Computer Engineering, which they added as a 5th "Core" field for a BS. It's essentially the same as an EE except for the senior electives.

The reason my school (UMass) gives for doing this is that most employers prefer a degree from the traditional four fields of engineering. For instance, Pfizer and a few other big pharmaceutical companies told UMass they prefer someone with a traditional ChemE degree over a BioChemE degree.

But by choosing the right electives along with a few extra classes you can usually mix it up.

For example, I'm working on my EE degree (for control systems design) but I plan to get my masters in Environmental Engineering (Water/Wastewater). I'm taking the undergrad courses within the civil program that form the foundation for water/wastewater as extra electives (Thermodynamics, Fluid Dynamics, Environmental Engineering Principles, and Water/WW Design).

Most departments will work with you if you have an idea of what field you want to be in and what you want to do. I've been working in the Wastewater field operating a plant for about 10 years now, and I have a good idea of what I need to learn to do the things I want to do.

But my advice to you (as given to me) is to choose one of the traditional four fields as the core of your engineering education.
 
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...
Back
Top