Clarification about a conductor as an equipotential

AI Thread Summary
A conductor is considered an equipotential when it is in electrostatic equilibrium, meaning that the electric potential is the same at any two points within it. Initially, when placed in an external electric field, the conductor's points may have different potentials, but the movement of electrons leads to a redistribution of charge until equilibrium is achieved. This process occurs rapidly in good conductors, resulting in zero electric field within the conductor. Therefore, for any two points within the conductor, including the pole and the center, the potential will ultimately be equal. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing electric fields and potentials in conductive materials.
anban
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Clarification about a conductor as an equipotential...

Homework Statement



This is not a specific problem, but a general question I have.

In Griffiths 2.5 (pg. 97 for Third Edition), it states that "A conductor is an equipotential. For if a and b are any two points within (or at the surface of) a give conductor, V(a)-V(b)= -∫ E dl = 0, and hence V(a) = V(b)."

Does this apply to ANY two points within the conductor? Say the conductor is in an external E field and polarizes. If I picked a point at the pole and a point in the center, would V(a) = V(b)?

The reason I am confused is because I am associating a charge density with potential... not sure if this is alright.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, a conductor is equipotential when it is in equilibrium. If you put a conductor into static electric field, its points are at different potential at the beginning, but the field forces the electrons to move, and they reach their equilibrium positions, where they experience zero force. And the time to reach the equilibrium is very short for a good conductor.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top