Clarification on force on frictional surface constant speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of forces acting on objects moving at constant speed. It argues that a 10-N force applied to a block on a frictional surface should be described as maintaining its motion rather than pushing it, as the force cancels out the friction. Similarly, for a 2-kg object being pulled upward by a 20-N force, the force is seen as maintaining its upward motion against gravity. However, the counterargument emphasizes that forces act directly on objects, and both the applied force and opposing forces affect the object's motion. The net force being zero allows for constant velocity, but the forces themselves still act on the objects involved.
meloettakawaii
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
for the following 2 examples from:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/energy/Lesson-1/Calculating-the-Amount-of-Work-Done-by-Forces

A 10-N force is applied to push a block across a frictional surface at constant speed for a displacement of 5.0 m to the right.
u5l1a15.gif

Would it be more accurate to say that a 10-N force is applied to 'Maintain' (not to push or pull) a block across a frictional surface at constant speed for a displacement of 5.0m to the right?

because the 10-N force is acting upon the frictional force canceling it out in order for the block to continue moving at its original velocity. the 10-N force isn't acting on the block to push it when it is canceled out by friction. the block is in equilibrium with constant velocity.

also

An approximately 2-kg object is pulled upward at constant speed by a 20-N force for a vertical displacement of 5 m.

u5l1a17.gif

Would it be more accurate to say that an approximately 2-kg object is 'moving' upward at a constant speed 'maintained' by a 20-N force for a vertical displacement of 5 m?

because again, the tension force is acting not on the object but on the force of gravity. (any excess would be acting on the object). if a force is canceled out, it can't act on the object!

thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Pierce610
Physics news on Phys.org
meloettakawaii said:
for the following 2 examples from:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/energy/Lesson-1/Calculating-the-Amount-of-Work-Done-by-Forces

A 10-N force is applied to push a block across a frictional surface at constant speed for a displacement of 5.0 m to the right.
u5l1a15.gif

Would it be more accurate to say that a 10-N force is applied to 'Maintain' (not to push or pull) a block across a frictional surface at constant speed for a displacement of 5.0m to the right?

because the 10-N force is acting upon the frictional force canceling it out in order for the block to continue moving at its original velocity. the 10-N force isn't acting on the block to push it when it is canceled out by friction. the block is in equilibrium with constant velocity.

also

An approximately 2-kg object is pulled upward at constant speed by a 20-N force for a vertical displacement of 5 m.

u5l1a17.gif

Would it be more accurate to say that an approximately 2-kg object is 'moving' upward at a constant speed 'maintained' by a 20-N force for a vertical displacement of 5 m?

because again, the tension force is acting not on the object but on the force of gravity. (any excess would be acting on the object). if a force is canceled out, it can't act on the object!

thanks.
Your thinking is not correct. Forces act on objects, not on other forces. In your second example, the 20 N applied force acts upward on the object, and the 20 N weight force (gravity force) acts downward on the object. Together, the net force acting on the object is 0, so the object, once set in motion with a nudge, moves at constant speed , per Newton 1. Or in your first example, both the applied 10 N force and the opposite 10 N friction force act on the object. If you were the 'object', you would certainly feel an internal force acting on you, even though the net external force acting on you is 0.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top