Clarification on tension problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a tension problem involving mass A and its acceleration along an inclined plane. The user is confused about the application of trigonometry, specifically how the formula for acceleration includes mg * sin(theta). Clarifications indicate that the equations are based on force rather than acceleration, and projecting the gravitational force onto the incline reveals the role of theta. The user expresses frustration with the complexities of trigonometry in this context. Understanding the projection of forces is key to solving the problem accurately.
Xari
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown.
I'm having trouble solving this problem. I did Google the solution with the steps, which I managed to actually get right in all aspects except for a small part in the trigonometry that throws me off.

0332207068.png


I drew my FBD's correctly, hopefully. I'm not sure how I can draw nice looking FBDs online, but here goes.

b9c027fdfb.jpg


In the solution it says that the acceleration of mass A is mg * sin (theta). Why is that so? I thought that we're trying to get gravity's force on the object with the formula: sin (theta) = (mA * g) / hypotenuse ----------->
hypotenuse = (mA * g) / sin (theta). That way we'd get the force in the direction opposite to the force of tension, which is caused by mB * g?

If I'm not wrong, isn't sin (theta = opp / hypotenuse? How did they get sin (theta) * mAg when that isn't even feasible in the trigonometry equation of sin(theta) = (mAg)/hypotenuse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Xari, :welcome:

Xari said:
it says that the acceleration of mass A is mg * sin (theta).
It says the acceleration is along the inclined plane, the x-axis therefore. The equations shown are in terms of force, not acceleration.
Xari said:
If I'm not wrong, isn't sin (theta = opp / hypotenuse
You are not wrong. Project mg onto the inclined plane and you'll see ##\theta## sitting there
upload_2016-5-8_23-26-22.png
 
  • Like
Likes Xari
BvU said:
Hi Xari, :welcome:It says the acceleration is along the inclined plane, the x-axis therefore. The equations shown are in terms of force, not acceleration.
You are not wrong. Project mg onto the inclined plane and you'll see ##\theta## sitting there
View attachment 100463
Omg that makes me so angry. Trig is so slippery!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top