Clarification on what the questions asking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob87411
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the interpretation of a physics question regarding interference patterns in light reflected from a glass plate covered with oil. It confirms that at a wavelength of 500 nm, the reflected light exhibits destructive interference, while at 750 nm, it shows constructive interference. The key point is that the question specifies these effects at those exact wavelengths, rather than implying a range of wavelengths. Participants express confusion over the wording of the question, particularly regarding the terms "after 500 nm" and "after 750 nm." Ultimately, the focus remains on calculating the thickness of the oil film based on the observed interference patterns at the specified wavelengths.
Jacob87411
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
A glass plate (n=1.61) is covered with a thin uniform layer of oil (n=1.2). A light beam in air of variable wavelength is normally incident on the oil surface. Observation of the reflected beam shows destructive interference at 500 nm and constructive interference at 750 nm. Calculate the thickness of the oil film from this information.


Is the question saying that when the wavelength is 500 its destructive and when wavelength equals 750 its constructive or after 500 nm it interferes destructively and at 750 nm it interferes constructively
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would interpret the question the way you did the first time around i.e. since the question says the incident beam's wavelength can vary (this is the key bit of info), I would intepret it to mean the following:

1. When the incident beam has a wavelength of 500 nm, the reflected beam interferes destructively with it.

2. When the incident beam has a wavelength of 750 nm, the reflected beam interferes constructively with it.

To be honest, I find the wording of your second interpretation to be even more confusing than the original question :-p , and I am really not sure what you are driving at because I can't understand what is meant by "after 500 nm" and "after 750 nm."

I'm pretty confident what I wrote above (1 and 2) is the right interpretation.
 
?The question is asking for the thickness of the oil film on the glass plate based on the observed destructive and constructive interference at specific wavelengths of light. This means that at 500 nm, the reflected light shows destructive interference, while at 750 nm, it shows constructive interference. The question is not specifying whether the interference occurs immediately after 500 nm or 750 nm, but rather at those specific wavelengths.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top