Clarifying the Confusion: Op Amp Gain in Non-Inverting Amplifier Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the calculation of gain in non-inverting amplifier circuits. It highlights that the closed-loop gain is primarily determined by the resistor ratio (R1/R2) rather than the open-loop gain of the op-amp, which can be extremely high. While the open-loop gain is theoretically infinite, practical applications often use lower gains due to noise and other factors. Different op-amp models exist to cater to specific needs, such as low bias current or high-frequency performance. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between open-loop and closed-loop gain is crucial for accurate circuit design.
aesoph13442
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
According to my professor's model answer for an assignment, when we derive the transfer function of an op amp circuit, we have a "K" value, which is the open loop gain of the op amp (I am not 100% certain), multiplied to the op amp circuit (1+R1/R2 for non-inverting amplifier for example). I need to multiply the "open loop gain" with "close loop gain" in order to get the transfer function for a specific circuit. However, when I read the non-inverting amplifier section in "fundamental of microelectronics" by Ravazi, his explanation is in the following: "Interestingly, the voltage gain depends on only the ratio of the resistors; if R1 and R2
increase by 20%, R1/R2 remains constant." It's on page 358 for 2nd edition. I just wonder which version is correct.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes berkeman and aesoph13442
this is correct

watch this video
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...E950D0C45487CFCBDAEFE950D0C45487CFC&FORM=VIRE

Dave (not me) explains opamps very well :)
Dave

Thank you Dave! I have one more question. If the gain only depends on other components rather than the op amp itself, what is the point of having different models of op amp? I know some op amps are designed to remain a "normal" behavior in higher frequencies or have a larger bandwidth. But besides those reasons, what is the point of using a different model of op amp? Let's say I am plotting the bode plot of some transfer functions, some of them start at 0dB and some start at 60dB or a different value. The starting point depends on the constant coefficient of the transfer function. Does the op amp determine the value of the constant? Is it the open loop gain (gain of the op amp)?
 
Last edited:
aesoph13442 said:
If the gain only depends on other components rather than the op amp itself, what is the point of having different models of op amp?
You can rely on the resistor ratio to be an approximation to the gain of the op-amp-with-feedback only if the op-amp's open-loop gain far exceeds that. And as you say, if you want high closed-loop gain at higher frequencies then the op-amp itself must be able to deliver even higher gain at those higher frequencies. A good high frequency response equates to a snappy behavior with squarewaves.

Some op-amps are designed to draw very very low currents at the inputs so these will take almost no power from the signal source.
 
aesoph13442 said:
If the gain only depends on other components rather than the op amp itself, what is the point of having different models of op amp?

The open loop gain of any/all op-amps is very high, in theory, infinity, practically tho, 10's or 100's of 1000's, which for normal use is never needed.
10's or 100's or occasionally a few 1000 gain is the most ever used ( depending on requirements)

Why are there so many ?
Many reasons ... many of the earlier versions are still around they may have lower gain before noise becomes a problem
other newer ones have extremely low noise, high current handling output, higher working voltage etc

looking through different datasheets, you will be able to see the beneficial features some have over others
for some basic circuits where input bias currents etc are not critical to the op-amp or circuit operation beans that cheaper more basic op-amps can be used

Other circuits may call for high precision very low bias current leakage and so there are op-amps made for that purposeDave
 
aesoph13442 said:
I need to multiply the "open loop gain" with "close loop gain" in order to get the transfer function for a specific circuit. .
That`s definitely wrong. The following formula says everything (Aol=open-loop gain, k=feedback factor):

Closed-loop gain (non-inverting amplifier with k=R2/(R1+R2))
Acl
=Aol/(1+Aol*k)=1/(1/Aol+k).
For 1/Aol<<k we get Acl=1/k.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top