Classical Classical Eletrodynamics, Jackson

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andreol263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Jackson
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges and requirements of reading a complex physics book, specifically focusing on the experiences with Jackson's text. The initial reader expresses concerns about the perceived difficulty and the need for a solid understanding of the material. Emphasis is placed on the importance of engaging with end-of-chapter exercises to deepen comprehension, as merely reading without practice may lead to gaps in understanding. The conversation highlights that even familiar concepts can present challenges and that problem-solving is crucial for grasping the material. There are mentions of the book's abstract explanations and logical jumps, but the reader finds the content intriguing, particularly the introductions to quantum electrodynamics (QED) and solid-state physics. Recommendations include starting with a relativistic approach and using the second edition of the book, which is noted for its use of CGS units. Overall, the consensus is that while the problems are tough, they significantly enhance understanding, and persistence is key.
Andreol263
Messages
77
Reaction score
15
I've started reading the book on the title, but exists so fuzz here about this book and it's scared me a bit, I'm in the middle of chapter 2 right now, and nothing difficult appeared to me in this moment, what are the requeriments to read this book smothly until the end?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been told the mathematics in Jackson is sadistic.
 
Have you started doing the end-of-chapter exercises yet?
 
No..
 
If you're not doing any exercises you're not going to build any real understanding of the material.
 
It's because i haven't finished the chapter 2 yet, but i will do the exercises, chapter 1 it's only the derivation of basic concepts of eletrostatics, there's nothing new in that, i have studied Griffith book...
 
Problems involving even old concepts can provide opportunities to improve your understanding. Also just because you think you can "see" your way to a solution does mean that you can solve the problem for some problems are wrought with conceptual traps and complexities that will thwart your efforts. At this stage in the development of a subject the problem sets should not be simply a mere repetition of the concepts of the text. Use the athletes routine of "warming up" before you do the heavy lifting.
 
Jackson's book is very good and quite comprehensive. For my taste, I'd start much earlier with a fully relativistic treatment and I'd recommend the 2nd edition, because it's written fully in the good old CGS units (unfortunately in the Gaussian and not in modern rationalized Heaviside-Lorentz units, but it's better than SI in any case, because SI units destroy the elegance and inner logic of the theory unnecessarily).

The problems are tough, but solving tough problems adds a lot to your understanding of the subject. Only don't get discouraged too soon. As I said, the problems are tough!
 
Yeah, i agree, but sometimes the book can go quite abstract in explanation, with huge logic jumbs between the equations,but nothing impossible at the moment and the subjects in the book appears to be quite cool too, with some introduction to QED and Solid State.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top