Which textbook is the best for learning classical mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the evaluation of a specific physics book, noted for its affordability and positive reviews. Participants agree that it is suitable for advanced undergraduate students and is considered one of the better classical mechanics texts available. The term "mathematically oriented" is clarified to mean a calculus-based approach, though some participants note that the book lacks the rigor found in other texts like Goldstein's. Alternatives such as Douglass Gregory's "Classical Mechanics" and Greiner's book are also recommended for those seeking different perspectives or levels of mathematical rigor. Overall, the book is viewed favorably for its educational value in classical mechanics.
johnnyies
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a good book IMO at the level of advanced undergrad. What do you mean by "mathematically oriented"? What level of mathematical rigor are you looking for? Taylor is not as rigorous as some others such as Goldstein. You can take a look at the contents on Amazon to get a feel for what it covers.
 
mathematically oriented I mean at least calc based.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top