Classical Mechanics Goldstein 2.16

punkimedes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In certain situations, particularly one-dimensional systems, it is possible to incorporate frictional effects without introducing the dissipation function. As an example, find the equations of motion for the lagrangian ##L = e^{γt} (\frac{m\dot{q}^2}{2} - \frac{kq^2}{2})##. How would you describe the system? Are there any constants of motion? Suppose a point transformation is made of the form ##s = e^{γt/2}q##. What is the effective Lagrangian in terms of ##s##? Find the equation of motion for ##s##. What do these results say about the conserved quantities for the system.

Homework Equations



Lagrange-euler equation ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} = 0##

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the lagrange-euler equation, I came up with one equation of motion ##m\ddot{q}+mγ\dot{q}+kq = 0##

Is this correct? I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I solve this for ##q## like a normal second order differential equation? Can I treat ##γ## as a constant knowing nothing about it? If so, the factoring doesn't seem to come out right. (let ##y=e^{rt}##, ##my^2+mγy+k = 0##, then ?)

Also, I'm not really sure what is meant by a point transformation. Does that simply mean replace that factor in the original lagrangian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello PM, and wecome to PF.

I dug up your exercise (2.14) in the second edition and there it has ##s = e^{γt}q##. Would that have been changed ?

The EL eqn gives you the equation of motion, which I think you found correctly.

Note the exercise wants you to write out the effective Lagrangian for ##s## and then find the equation of motion for ##s##.

Oh, and: yes ##\gamma## is a constant.
 
Last edited:
Thanks BvU. I should have mentioned I have the third edition. The problem shows in this book exactly as I wrote it. I guess I'm stuck on the first part of the problem. I don't know how to interpret equation of motion from the lagrangian without solving the differential equation, and the equation I've come up with is unfactorable.
 
punkimedes said:

Homework Statement



In certain situations, particularly one-dimensional systems, it is possible to incorporate frictional effects without introducing the dissipation function. As an example, find the equations of motion for the lagrangian ##L = e^{γt} (\frac{m\dot{q}^2}{2} - \frac{kq^2}{2})##. How would you describe the system? Are there any constants of motion? Suppose a point transformation is made of the form ##s = e^{γt/2}q##. What is the effective Lagrangian in terms of ##s##? Find the equation of motion for ##s##. What do these results say about the conserved quantities for the system.

Homework Equations



Lagrange-euler equation ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} = 0##

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the lagrange-euler equation, I came up with one equation of motion ##m\ddot{q}+mγ\dot{q}+kq = 0##
You should recognize this differential equation, particularly if ##\gamma=0##. It might also help to rewrite it as
$$m\ddot{q} = -m\gamma \dot{q} - kq$$ or perhaps use ##x## instead of ##q## so it looks more familiar.
 
Dear PM, what I meant to express is that you already found the equation of motion (there is only one coordinate, so there is only one equation in this exercise). It looks a lot like F = ma, which is not a coincidence. F consists of two terms, one (-kq) having to do with displacement from q = 0, the other something like -##\beta \dot q## (## \beta = \gamma ##). You are not asked to solve, but to describe the system. How would you describe the system if ##\gamma=0##? What could the other term represent ?

And yes, Herbie wants you to rewrite L(q) as L(s). Work it out and show us...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top