Classical Physics-Modern Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wannabeagenius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Physics
AI Thread Summary
Classical physics generally refers to the theories and principles established before the 20th century, primarily encompassing Newtonian mechanics, electromagnetism, and Einstein's theory of relativity. It is often contrasted with modern physics, which includes quantum mechanics and theories that predict probabilistic outcomes rather than deterministic ones. While some consider General Relativity as part of classical physics, the distinction can vary based on context. Classical physics models nature as deterministic, while modern physics introduces fundamental uncertainties in predictions. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the evolution of physical theories.
Wannabeagenius
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I'm not sure exactly what is considered classical physics.

I always thought it was everything before Einstein's Theory Of Special Relativity but recently I read that it is everything other than Quantum Mechanics.

Please clarify this for me.

Thank you,
Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I gather, there are two distinctions, depending on the context in which you are talking about classical vs. modern physics. You pinpoint both of them very nicely.

For an undergraduate course in classical physics, it's probably everything before 1900. However, I often hear General Relativity referred to as a classical theory, especially when it's juxtaposed with a theory of quantum gravity. So, depends on the context.
 
Wannabeagenius said:
Hi All,

I'm not sure exactly what is considered classical physics.

I always thought it was everything before Einstein's Theory Of Special Relativity but recently I read that it is everything other than Quantum Mechanics.

Please clarify this for me.

Thank you,
Bob

I think classical physics is all physics that models Nature as deterministic and in principle predicts that all outcomes of an experiment are knowable exactly, Newton's Laws, Maxwell's equations, Einstein's theory of relativity. Non-classical physics predicts only probabilistic outcomes of experiments and models Nature as probabalistic rather than deterministic. Quantum mechanics when first proposed said that there is no possibility of a precisely predicted outcome of an experiment and that the underlying physical processes were fundamentally probabalistic. Now a days I am not sure that this is still true.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top