Classification of schrodinger equation?

boderam
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
the schrodinger equation is sometimes called a wave equation and in my quantum mechanics text's they often show the wave equation comparing it to the schrodinger equation. i don't understand why they do this when it is of the same form as the heat equation, it's not second order in time like the wave equation. why is this? thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because of the i, the Schrodinger equation does lead to traveling waves.
The exp(-t/tau) of the heat equation becomes exp(-iEt).
Because it is first order in time, a QM wave packet spreads with time.
A wave packet for the wave equation doesn't spread unless the medium is dispersive.
 
Because it is first order in time, a QM wave packet spreads with time.
why so?
 
why is it necessary that the schrodinger equation be first order in time? or rather, why is it necessary for the wave packet to spread in time in terms of experimental results?
 
Last edited:
All QM texts show that the SE must be first order in time to preserve the norm of the the function. The spread is hard to see experimentally.
The spread is the usual spread of the diffusion equation, which is also first order in time.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top