Classification of semi-simple Lie groups

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
A while ago I heard the following two facts about semi-simple Lie groups (though I have a feeling they may have to be restricted to connected semi-simple Lie groups):

1. That semi-simple Lie groups are classified by their weight (and co-weight) and root (and co-root) lattices;
2. That all of these lattices can be deduced from the fundamental representations of the group. (So that if we have a complete set of representations we can go on and infer the group.)

Can someone confirm for me that these are indeed the case, or suggest a reference where the above are stated? (I am a physics graduate but with little pure math knowledge, so the more approachable the better.) Thanks a lot!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AFAIK you need only the root systems and the adjoint representations for the classification, not all possible representations. It's a bit easier for the Lie algebras.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top