Classify the equlibrium points of the system-Pls help me, its

  • Thread starter Thread starter rakhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equlibrium Points
rakhi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Classify the equlibrium points of the system-Pls help me, its urgent!

Hi ,

I have my maths exam tomorow and I am not able to understand the concept to classify the equilibrium points of a system.. I will be grateful if anyone could help me with this problem

Classify the equilibrium points of the system :

x'= )y^3)-4x
y'= (y^3)-y-3x
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The equilibrium points are where the derivatives are zero, right? So what happens if you put the derivatives as zero in those equations?
 


Hello,

He's asking how to classify them, not how to find them.
 


rakhi said:
Hi ,

I have my maths exam tomorow and I am not able to understand the concept to classify the equilibrium points of a system.. I will be grateful if anyone could help me with this problem

Classify the equilibrium points of the system :

x'= )y^3)-4x
y'= (y^3)-y-3x

The first thing to do is "linearize" the system close to each equilibrium point. I presume you have found that the equilibrium points are (0, 0), (2, 2), and (-2, -2).

If x and y are close to 0, then, since powers get smaller and smaller close to 0, the linearization is x'= -4x, y'= -y- 3x. You could actually solve the equations to get x= Ce^{-4t}, y= De^{-t}- Ce^{-4t} and see from that that both x and y go to zero as t goes to infinity. Another, perhaps simpler, method is to think of it as a matrix equation:
\frac{d}{dt}\begin{pmatrix}x(t) \\ y(t)\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}-4 & 0 \\ -3 & -1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y\end{pmatrix}
and observe that its eigenvalues, which are -4 and -1, are both negative.

In fact the simplest thing to do is to form the "Jacobian" of the left side,
\begin{pmatrix}\frac{\partial y^3- 4x}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial y^3- 4x}{\partial y} \\ \frac{\partial y^3- y- 3x}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial y^3- y- 3x}{\partial y}\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}-4 & 3y^2 \\ -3 & 3y^2- 1\end{pmatrix}
and then set x= 0,y= 0, x= 2, y= 2, x= -2, y= -2, to find the eigenvalues.

For example, setting x= 0, y= 0 gives
\begin{pmatrix} -4 & 0 \\ -3 & -1\end{pmatrix}
which has eigenvalues -4 and -1 as before.

Setting x= 2, y= 2 gives
\begin{pmatrix}-4 & 12 \\ - 3 & 11\end{pmatrix}
which has eigenvalues 8 and -1. Since one eigenvalue is positive and the other negative, this is a saddle point. Further, (1, 1) is an eigenvector for eigenvalue 8 and eigenvector (2, 1) associated with eigenvalue -1. So if you draw lines through (2, 2) in those directions, you could get a rough graph of the solutions in that region.

Setting x= -2, y= -2 gives the same matrix (because there is no x and y is squared) so the same eigenvalues and eigenvectors. (-2, 2) is also a saddle point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top