Classsification of Pre main sequence(PMS) stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter vrinda mukund
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The classification of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars is based on color-color diagrams, categorized into class 0, class I, and class II. Participants discuss the applicability of this classification to PMS stars, emphasizing its relevance and referencing the appendix of Koenig et al. (2012) for further details. There is a request for better references to support the discussion, as some participants are unfamiliar with the cited papers. Additional resources, including various research papers and notes on young stellar objects, are shared to aid understanding. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate references in astrophysical research.
vrinda mukund
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
there is a classification of PMS based on color-color diagram as class 0, class I and class II. can some one please explain more about this classification or provide me with some useful link. I am trying to plot color-color diagram of an Open cluster using Wise Band data.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That applies to main sequence stars, not protostars.
 
no, its applicable to PMS. see the appendix portion of the paper by Koenig et.al(2012).
 
@vrinda - please post a better reference - meaning we did not happen to read the paper you have in mind, so how can we read it, too?
 
vrinda mukund said:
no, its applicable to PMS. see the appendix portion of the paper by Koenig et.al(2012).
This paper?

Koenig, X. P. and Leisawitz, D. T. and Benford, D. J. and Rebull, L. M. and Padgett, D. L. and Assef, R. J. (2012) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer Observations of the Evolution of Massive Star-forming Regions. Astrophysical Journal, 744 (2). p. 130. ISSN 0004-637X
http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120130-115037613

There is a paper by Koenig (2008) http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3284 that is referenced by:

Wide-Field Survey of Emission-line Stars in IC 1396
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2761.pdf

Pre-main-sequence population in NGC 1893 region
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.5632.pdf


Perhaps this is of interest: Introduction to Young Stellar Objects
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~ay216/08/NOTES/Lecture24-08.pdf

http://hubblesite.org/hubble_discoveries/science_year_in_review/pdf/2007/progressive_star_formation_in_the_magellanic_clouds.pdf
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top