Clebsch-Gordan coefficients symmetry relation

3 replies · 2K views · last reply
Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
Why are ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## negative of each other when ##j_1+j_2-j## is odd as given below?
Text reading: and the symmetry relations, followed by the equation <j1 j2 m1 m2|jm> = (-)^(j1+j2-j) <j2 j1 m2 m1|jm>.


I would expect ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## to always have the same sign since nature doesn't care which particle we label as particle 1 and which as particle 2.

Printed text equation (6.274): a normalised simultaneous eigenvector of J1², J2², J1z and J2z is the direct product |j1 j2 m1 m2> = |j1 m1>|j2 m2>, with eigenvalues j1(j1+1)ħ² and j2(j2+1)ħ².


From (6.274), isn't it true that
##|j_1j_2m_1m_2>\,=|j_1m_1>|j_2m_2>\,=|j_2m_2>|j_1m_1>\,=|j_2j_1m_2m_1>##?

And hence
##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|=\,<j_2j_1m_2m_1|##?

And so ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## should always have the same sign.

##j## is the general angular momentum quantum number and ##m## is the associated magnetic quantum number.
 
Think of a cross product: a x b is - b x a, even though nature doesn't care which particle we call a and which we call b.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Think of a cross product: a x b is - b x a, even though nature doesn't care which particle we call a and which we call b.

Why does the order in the direct product matter?

Printed textbook page with equations 6.275 and 6.276: product state psi of j1 j2 m1 m2 as psi j1 m1 times psi j2 m2, and the J_z eigenvalue derivation giving (m1 + m2) hbar.


From (6.276),
##J_z \psi_{j_2 j_1 m_2 m_1}=(m_1+m_2)\hbar\psi_{j_2 j_1 m_2 m_1}##

It seems like the order doesn't matter. Could you give an example where the negative sign is necessary when the order is flipped around?
 
The important thing the C-G coefficients is their relative sign. That's where the SU(2) algebra is captured. You will need the sign only when you add terms.