Clebsch-Gordan coefficients symmetry relation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
Why are ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## negative of each other when ##j_1+j_2-j## is odd as given below?
Screen Shot 2016-02-23 at 8.07.15 pm.png


I would expect ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## to always have the same sign since nature doesn't care which particle we label as particle 1 and which as particle 2.

Screen Shot 2016-02-23 at 8.06.49 pm.png


From (6.274), isn't it true that
##|j_1j_2m_1m_2>\,=|j_1m_1>|j_2m_2>\,=|j_2m_2>|j_1m_1>\,=|j_2j_1m_2m_1>##?

And hence
##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|=\,<j_2j_1m_2m_1|##?

And so ##<j_1j_2m_1m_2|jm>## and ##<j_2j_1m_2m_1|jm>## should always have the same sign.

##j## is the general angular momentum quantum number and ##m## is the associated magnetic quantum number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanadium 50 said:
Think of a cross product: a x b is - b x a, even though nature doesn't care which particle we call a and which we call b.

Why does the order in the direct product matter?

Screen Shot 2016-02-23 at 8.35.06 pm.png


From (6.276),
##J_z \psi_{j_2 j_1 m_2 m_1}=(m_1+m_2)\hbar\psi_{j_2 j_1 m_2 m_1}##

It seems like the order doesn't matter. Could you give an example where the negative sign is necessary when the order is flipped around?