Clocks & Curvature: How Space-Time Affects Timekeeping

  • Thread starter Thread starter Negeng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks
Negeng
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
In a place of gravity, where space time is bent "inward" clocks slow down from the prospective of an outsider. But what if you had a region of space time that was bent outward, what would happen to your clocks then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to know what you mean by "bent inward" or "bent outward." In the Schwarzschild solution, g00 = 1 - 2m/r, which is less than 1, and so for a particle sitting still at finite r the proper time is less than the coordinate time, consequently its clock runs slow. For the Reissner-Nordstrom solution, g00 = 1 - 2m/r + e2/r2, and so for certain values of the parameters (m=0 for example) g00 will be greater than 1, and clocks will run fast.
 
Simply put, gravity slows clocks down. Negative gravity would probably speed them up, but that doesn't sound realistic to me. :-p
 
harrylin said:
Simply put, gravity slows clocks down. Negative gravity would probably speed them up, but that doesn't sound realistic to me. :-p

I got the impression from the cosmology section that there are situations that simulate "Negative gravity" they bend space and time in the oppisate direction than gravity does. For example the inflation of the universe that happened soon after the big bang. Is this impression wrong?
 
Inflation did not involve curved spacetime...if anything it's this:

...Inflation answers the classic conundrum of the Big Bang cosmology: why does the universe appear flat, homogeneous and isotropic in accordance with the cosmological principle when one would expect, on the basis of the physics of the Big Bang, a highly curved, heterogeneous universe?

more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_inflation

But the driving force of inflation, "negative energy vacuum density", I guess could be informally described as "negative gravity" but I have never seen it referred to as such...currently it is usually called the cosmological constant or dark energy. I have not seen cosmological expansion described as resulting from "negative gravity"...but that could be an informal description since "negative energy" seems not so different..
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top