Closed Form Solutions for Differentiable Inverse Functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if every closed form on a differentiable function's domain u is exact, then the same holds for its image f(u). A closed form is defined as a differential form ω where dω = 0, and a form is exact if it can be expressed as ω = dφ for some differential form φ. The Poincaré lemma states that closed forms on a domain are exact. By applying the pullback operator f^{\star} and the inverse function f^{-1}, it is demonstrated that closed forms on f(u) can also be expressed as exact forms. This establishes that closed forms on f(u) are indeed exact, completing the proof.
rocket
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
closed form??

let f:u \rightarrow R^n be a differentiable function with a differentiable inverse f^{-1}: f(u) \rightarrow R^n. if every closed form on u is exact, show that the same is true for f(u).

Hint: if dw=0 and f^{\star}w = d\eta, consider (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta.


i don't know where to start with the problem. what is a closed form? what does it mean that "every closed form on u is exact"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, where did you get the problem? I can't believe that wherever you got the problem (class or text) didn't have a definition of "closed" and "exact" form!

A differential form ω is closed if dω= 0, exact if ω= dφ for some differential form φ. It can be shown that d(dφ)= 0 for any differential form φ so if ω is exact then dω= d(d&phi)= 0.

One question you didn't ask: what is f^{\star}?
 


A closed form is a differential form that is closed, meaning that its exterior derivative is equal to zero. In other words, the form's integral over any closed curve or surface is equal to zero.

The statement that "every closed form on u is exact" means that any closed form on the domain of the function, u, can be written as the exterior derivative of another form. This is known as the Poincaré lemma.

To show that the same is true for f(u), we can use the hint provided. Let dw=0 be a closed form on u. Then, using the pullback operator f^{\star}, we can write it as d\eta for some form \eta on f(u). Now, using the inverse function f^{-1}, we can pull back \eta to u, giving us (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta. Since pullback is linear, we have (f^{-1})^{\star}d\eta = d((f^{-1})^{\star}\eta). This shows that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta is a closed form on u, and therefore by the Poincaré lemma, it must be exact. This means that there exists a form \omega on u such that (f^{-1})^{\star}\eta = d\omega. Now, using the pullback again, we have f^{\star}(f^{-1})^{\star}\eta = f^{\star}d\omega. However, since f^{\star} and (f^{-1})^{\star} are inverse operations, we have f^{\star}(f^{-1})^{\star}\eta = \eta. Therefore, we have shown that any closed form on f(u) can be written as the exterior derivative of another form, making it exact. This completes the proof.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top