Closed set, compact set, and a definition of distance between sets

txy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let E and F be 2 non-empty subsets of R^{n}. Define the distance between E and F as follows:

d(E,F) = inf_{x\in E , y\in F} | x - y |

(a). Give an example of 2 closed sets E and F (which are non-empty subsets of R^n) that satisfy d(E,F) = 0 but the intersection of E and F is a null set.

(b). If E and F (non-empty subsets of R^n) are compact sets and d(E,F) = 0, prove that the intersection of E and F cannot be the null set.


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Part (b) of the question suggests that the closed sets in part (a) are not bounded. But I still can't find these 2 sets with d(E,F) = 0 and yet they don't intersect.

For part (b), maybe I can find a sequence of points x_{k} in E and another sequence y_{k} in F such that as k increases, the distance between x_{k} and y_{k} decreases. Then since E and F are compact, therefore these 2 sequences must converge. And since d(E,F) = 0, hence these 2 sequences must converge to the same point. And then since E and F are compact, this limit point must lie in both E and F, thus E and F share at least one common point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (b), think about the graphs of 1/x2 and -1/x2 as an example.

That looks like a pretty good sketch argument. Only thing is that only a subsequence of each of those must converge, but it amounts to the same result here
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top