Does a Closed Universe Satisfy the FRW Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the equations satisfy the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equations for a closed universe. The key equation presented is 3(˙a/a)² + kc²/a² = 8πGρ, which incorporates a spatial curvature term. Participants are attempting to manipulate the equations to show the relationship between the scale factor a and the curvature parameter k, while also addressing confusion regarding the initial conditions and the relationship between η and η₀. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in deriving the metric when η is treated as time, indicating that the problem may be simpler than it appears. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the mathematical relationships inherent in cosmological models of a closed universe.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a) Show that the equations satisfy FRW equations.
(b) Show the metric when ##\eta## is taken as time

frw1.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]
The FRW equation is:
3 \left( \frac{\dot a}{a} \right)^2 = 8\pi G \rho

Using ##\frac{da}{dt} = \frac{da}{d\eta} \frac{d\eta}{dt}##:

\dot a = \frac{\frac{1}{\eta_*} sin \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*}\right)}{1 - cos \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*} \right)}
\dot a = \frac{C sin \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*} \right)}{\eta_* a}

The LHS is then

3 \left( \frac{\dot a}{a} \right)^2 = 3 \left[ \frac{C^2 sin^2 (\frac{\eta}{\eta_*})}{\eta_*^2 a^4} \right]Not sure how to show this equals RHS..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



(a) Show that the equations satisfy FRW equations.
(b) Show the metric when ##\eta## is taken as time

frw1.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]
The FRW equation is:
3 \left( \frac{\dot a}{a} \right)^2 = 8\pi G \rho

Using ##\frac{da}{dt} = \frac{da}{d\eta} \frac{d\eta}{dt}##:

\dot a = \frac{\frac{1}{\eta_*} sin \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*}\right)}{1 - cos \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*} \right)}
\dot a = \frac{C sin \left( \frac{\eta}{\eta_*} \right)}{\eta_* a}

The LHS is then

3 \left( \frac{\dot a}{a} \right)^2 = 3 \left[ \frac{C^2 sin^2 (\frac{\eta}{\eta_*})}{\eta_*^2 a^4} \right]Not sure how to show this equals RHS..

In a closed universe the FRW equation has a spatial curvature term with a 'k' in it. You omitted that.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
In a closed universe the FRW equation has a spatial curvature term with a 'k' in it. You omitted that.

FRW equation is given by:
3 \left( \frac{\dot a}{a} \right)^2 + \frac{kc^2}{a^2} = 8\pi G \rho

Curvature parameter is given by ##\Omega = \frac{8\pi \rho G}{3H_0^2}##.

\frac{C^2 sin^2 (\frac{\eta}{\eta_*})}{\eta_*^2 a^4} + \frac{kc^2}{a^2} = \frac{\Omega}{H_0^2}

At ##t=0##, ##\frac{\eta_0}{\eta_*} = sin (\frac{\eta_0}{\eta_*})##, so ##a_0 = C\left[ 1 - \sqrt{1 - (\frac{\eta_0}{\eta_*})^2} \right]##.

Rearranging, ##(\frac{\eta_0}{\eta_*})^2 = (\frac{a_0}{c})(1 - \frac{a_0}{c})##.

How am I to relate ##\eta## to ##\eta_0##?
 
Last edited:
I'm just confused at this stage, shouldn't ##a_0 =1##? I have a feeling this problem is much simpler than it seems..Would appreciate some help
 
Last edited:
5th Attempt

\left( \frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G \rho}{3} - \frac{kc^2}{a^2}

Using ##\rho = \Omega \rho_c = \Omega \cdot \frac{3H^2}{8\pi G}##:

\left( \frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = \Omega H^2 - \frac{kc^2}{a^2}

\dot {a}^2 = \Omega \dot {a}^2 - kc^2

\frac{da}{dt} = c \sqrt{\frac{k}{\Omega -1}}

But there is no factor of ##C## on the LHS, as ##\frac{da}{dt} = \frac{sin(\frac{\eta}{\eta_*})}{\eta_* \left[1-cos(\frac{\eta}{\eta_*})\right]}##
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top