Closest approximated rational triangle

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Given 2 points on a plane, if you arbitrarily place a third, is there any way to determine the closest approximation to this triangle where all sides of the approximation are rationally related?

The only thing I can think of would be to draw a small circle around the third point that represents the acceptable search area for the third point of the approximation, but after that, I'm completely stuck.

Anyone know if there is a fairly efficient way to do this?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, because however close your approximation, there is another one which is closer. Between any two numbers (either real or rational) there are an infinite number of other rational numbers.
 
AlephZero said:
No, because however close your approximation, there is another one which is closer. Between any two numbers (either real or rational) there are an infinite number of other rational numbers.

Hmmm. What if the problem is redefined to:

The closest approximation whose sides are related by:

x, y, z, n = element of natural numbers
x, y, z < max
unit = 1/n

a = x * unit
b = y * unit
c = z * unit
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top