Closing an Open Ring: Effects and Standards | Subtransmission 69kV Line

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigjoe5263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of closing a circuit breaker in an open ring configuration of a subtransmission 69kV line. Participants explore the effects of closing the loop at point C, the standards involved, and the technical challenges associated with transitioning from an open to a closed ring, particularly in relation to fault currents and protection settings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the feasibility of closing the circuit breaker at point C given that all points A, B, and C have nearly equal voltage and the same frequency.
  • Another participant suggests that visual aids could enhance understanding of the configuration.
  • Several participants discuss the complexities involved in transitioning from an open to a closed ring, noting that fault currents may increase due to parallel paths.
  • There is a contention regarding the increase in fault currents, with one participant asserting that disturbances occur regardless of bus configuration.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of impedance in determining fault current magnitude, particularly under fault conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the added complexity of protection systems in closed ring configurations, with a participant noting that open rings are more common than closed rings in certain regions.
  • Another participant mentions the need to consider various parameters, such as voltage difference and phase angle, before closing the circuit breaker.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of closing the circuit breaker, particularly regarding fault currents and protection complexities. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the technical aspects involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of parameters like voltage and phase angle when closing circuit breakers, indicating that assumptions about system behavior may vary based on specific configurations and conditions.

bigjoe5263
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
hi guys,

just want to ask, an open loop has three points A,B, C and each point serving a load. there is only one source (a subtransmission 69kV line from a substation), connected at point A. The loop is open at line segment AC (the circuit breaker at point C, connecting the segment AC is open). The voltage at point A,B and C are almost equal, or there is only a small difference in magnitude. my question is this:

Since there is only one source, which means the frequency (60Hz) is the same at all points, is it possible to close the loop (circuit breaker) at point C? What would be the effect of closing? what are the standards parameters?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A picture would be helpfull
 
S--x----------x--A--x----------x--B--x----------x--C---
l l
x------------------------------------x

where:

S = source
A,B,C = interconnection (bus)
x = circuit breaker
-- = transmission line 69 kV
hope this will help you visualize what I have previously posted.

Thanks
 
S--x----------x--A--x----------x--B--x----------x--C--x---------x-->to point A




where:

S = source
A,B,C = interconnection (bus)
x = circuit breaker
-- = transmission line 69 kV
hope this will help you visualize what I have previously posted, sorry for the drawing I don't know how to make a good one here.

thanks
 

Attachments

  • ring bus.jpg
    ring bus.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 592
Going from an open ring to a closed ring can be difficult. The fault currents in the lines are increased, basically doubled as the 2 paths are in parallel. It also complicates the protection settings. I have had limited experience with HV, but from what I can gather it is only done in critical infrastructure situations where an interruption of power is not acceptable.
 
Snoogans said:
Going from an open ring to a closed ring can be difficult. The fault currents in the lines are increased, basically doubled as the 2 paths are in parallel. It also complicates the protection settings. I have had limited experience with HV, but from what I can gather it is only done in critical infrastructure situations where an interruption of power is not acceptable.
I don't see how the fault currents in the lines are increased because it's a ring bus. Any time you switch in a line, no mater what bus configuration you have, you're going to see some disturbances.
No separate relaying equipment is provided for a ring bus. Instead, the relaying equipments of the circuits connected to the bus include the bus within their zones of protection...
"www.gedigitalenergy.com/multilin/notes/artsci/art12.pdf"[/URL]
See figure 13 for how the protection relaying is accomplished for a ring bus.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Under fault conditions it is the impedance of the fault path and the impedance of the source that determine the magnitude of the current (assuming bolted fault). A closed ring has 2 paths from source to fault in parallel, therefore the impedance is less. Perhaps 'lines' wasn't the best word to use previously.

I am certain there is added complexity to closed ring protection systems, I'm just not sure how to describe them. I know open ring configurations are common, closed ring are not, well at least in Australia I should qualifiy.
 
dlgoff, that is almost the figure, except that A, B, C are load Bus, i.e. power transformer are connected to them, and also the ring configuration are connected to those bus through the transmission lines between them.
 
  • #10
bigjoe5263 said:
dlgoff, that is almost the figure, except that A, B, C are load Bus, i.e. power transformer are connected to them, and also the ring configuration are connected to those bus through the transmission lines between them.
This is probably what you have in mind.
attachment.php?attachmentid=23644&stc=1&d=1265846412.jpg

The situation is still the same as in my first reply (...you can open breakers to isolate one line without disturbing the other lines) except now your load includes a transformer. As to frequency change due to switching in the load, it takes a little time for the generators to catch up, hence there will be a slight lowering of frequency. This is call "rubber banding" I believe.
 

Attachments

  • ring bus.jpg
    ring bus.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 470
  • #11
digoff.. thanks for the figure.

assuming there are no generators involve, and circuit breaker A is initially open,
are there parameters to be check before circuit breaker is to be closed? what are the things need to be considered? i.e. voltage difference across the open breaker, phase angle, frequency.. etc
 
  • #12
You would have to have A and B open to isolate the left transformer. If just A is open, the there will be 69kV at the same freq. and phase on either side of A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K