Closure of an abelian subgroup

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The closure of an abelian subgroup A in a topological group is also abelian, provided the topological group is Hausdorff. The proof involves demonstrating that the closure cl(A) is a subgroup and then showing that it is abelian by using the continuity of multiplication and the convergence of nets or filters. In non-Hausdorff topological groups, this result does not hold, as limits may not be unique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological groups
  • Familiarity with the concept of closure in topology
  • Knowledge of Hausdorff spaces
  • Basic principles of continuity in mathematical operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hausdorff spaces in topology
  • Learn about convergence of nets and filters in general topological spaces
  • Explore examples of non-Hausdorff topological groups
  • Investigate the implications of second countability in topological groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and group theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between group structures and topological properties.

Jamma
Messages
432
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is a really easy question, so I apologise in advance.

Let A be an abelian subgroup of a topological group. I want to show that cl(A) is also.

Now I've shown that cl(A) is a subgroup, that is fairly easy. So I just need to show it is abelian.

For a metric space, it is easy, since we can just write for any two elements h_1 h_2 in cl(H) as

h_1=lim_{i -> infty} (h_1(i))
h_2=lim_{i -> infty} (h_2(i))

where h_1(i) and h_2(i) are sequences converging too h_1 and h_2 respectively which are in H. Then to find h_1.h_2 we can just multiply the elements of these limits since multiplication is continuous and then we can commute them to deduce that h_1.h_2=h_2.h_1

Can I do something similar for a general topological group, which is not a metric space? h_1 and h_2 are limit points, if they are not then they are in H anyway and will commute.

Maybe I just need my space to be Hausdorff, so then limits are unique?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, sorry, its going to be second (which implies first) countability that I will need. That will allow me to write the points as limits. Sorry!
 
Yes, you can use convergence of nets (or filters) to do the proof. But, as you note, Hausdorff is required. Indeed, the result is, in general, false in non-Hausdorff topological groups.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K