MHB Clovis's question at Yahoo Answers (bounded sequence)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
A bounded sequence can exist without a maximum or minimum element, exemplified by the sequence a_n = (-1)^n n/(n+1), which remains within the range of -1 to 1. Such a sequence will have an infimum and supremum but will not converge due to the presence of infinitely many elements near both bounds. Since the infimum and supremum must differ for the sequence to lack maximum and minimum elements, it indicates that the sequence cannot stabilize at a single limit. Therefore, a bounded sequence without a maximum or minimum does not converge. This highlights the relationship between boundedness and convergence in real analysis.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Construct a bounded sequence that has no maximum and no minimum element. Could a sequence like this converge? Why or why not?

Here is a link to the question:

Real Analysis Sequences 10pts? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Clovis,

Consider the sequence $a_n=\dfrac{(-1)^nn}{n+1}$. Easily proved, $-1\leq a_n\leq 1$ for all $n$ and the sequence has no maximum and no minimum element.

Now, suppose $x_n$ is bounded sequence, then it has a infimum $m$ and a supremum $M$. If $x_n$ has no maximum and minimum, it has infinitely many elements close both infimum and supremum, so we can construct two subsequences $x_{n_k}\to m$ and $x_{n_r}\to M$. But $m\neq M$ (otherwise, $x_n$ would be a constant sequence, i.e. with maximum and minimum). This means that $x_n$ does not converge.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K