Cluster radioactivity- want to know more?

  • Thread starter Thread starter logearav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
cluster radioactivity-- want to know more?

Dear members,
While browsing through some quantum mechanics websites, i came across cluster radioactivity, which surprised me, because so far i didn't hear that term as i am familiar with natural and artificial radioactivity.
It has been mentioned Cluster radioactivity is an intermediate process between alpha decay and nuclear fission. In natural radioactivity, we get alpha, beta and gamma rays and in cluster radioactivity it has been mentioned we get carbon, oxygen, magnesium, silicon etc. Does this mean the heavy nuclei decay to form these elements instead of alpha beta and gamma rays? I am fascinated by this topic and that's why i chose this forum to discuss about this. Hoping for a good discussion, revered members
 
Physics news on Phys.org


From this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluster_decay
I think that cluster decay is simply a rare form of Alpha decay where the nucleus ejects a much bigger "particle" instead of an alpha particle. It says that this decay mechanism only takes place in nuclei that decay via alpha decay and is a much rarer form. Looks like it has to do with quantum tunneling.
 


"via alpha decay"--- i don't understand sir. Did u mean, that alpha particle is formed first before decaying to the cluster?
 


No I mean that cluster decay only takes place in nuclei that normally decay by alpha decay.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top