CMRR formula gives wrong result

  • Thread starter Thread starter simpComp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
simpComp
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello,

If you go to this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-mode_rejection_ratio

and scroll all the way down to the bottom where they show the:

"Example: operational amplifiers"

section... we have:

So for example, an op-amp with 90dB CMRR operating with 10V of common-mode will have an output error of ±316uV.

I get +/-222mv ?

Am I doing the math wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
simpComp said:
Hello,

If you go to this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-mode_rejection_ratio

and scroll all the way down to the bottom where they show the:

"Example: operational amplifiers"

section... we have:



I get +/-222mv ?

Am I doing the math wrong?

I get the 316mV number. Can you show how you are typing the numbers into your calculator?
 
90/10
then the result is multiplied by 10.

then
10/the result above

hence:
10/((90/20)10) = 0.222?

and they get 316 micro volts?
 
simpComp said:
90/10
then the result is multiplied by 10.

then
10/the result above

hence:
10/((90/20)10) = 0.222?

and they get 316 micro volts?

I think there are several issues with the way you are trying to solve this. First remember that for voltage ratios, the equation is dB = 20log(ratio).

So for this problem, you start with 90dB = 20log(10/x).

To solve that equation, you divide both sides by 20, and then take 10^ for both sides.

Can you take it from there...?
 
Hi berkeman,

You talking to a very slow guy here!
so I try:

I went back to my algebra notes of 20 years ago and saw the example:

2 = log(base10)(100)

then I tried doing the reverse:

10^2 = 100

So then I understood that its 10 to the power of (90/20)...

So I did the same while following your instructions...

90dB = 20log(10/x)

90dB/20 = (20log(10/x))/20

4.5dB = log(10/x)

Antilog = 10^4.5 so:

10^4.5 = 10/x

which becomes:

10/31622.8 = x

316 uVThankyou for your help!
 
Last edited:
Woot! Good job! :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top