Codification of fundamental principals of physics

AI Thread Summary
Fundamental principles of physics, such as conservation of information and symmetry, are often not explicitly listed in modern textbooks. Some participants argue that these principles are either codified within existing theories or represent broader concepts rather than strict laws. The principle of parsimony, for example, is criticized as being more of a heuristic than a fundamental physical law. There is a debate about the validity and classification of these principles within the scientific community. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in defining what constitutes a fundamental principle in physics.
csmcmillion
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
There are a good number of very fundamental principles that underlie physics (conservation of information, principal of parsimony, time invariance, symmetry, etc.) that don't seem to be listed in modern physics textbooks. Are they codified somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are at least 3 principles in your list that I haven't heard of, or are not valid principles of physics.
 
Last edited:
I had to look some of them up too, basically those things you listed either are codified in theories (time invariance), or are more general ideas that are more notions, less law. For instance, the principle of parsimony is no more physics than saying 'the solution to the equation is 3 because that makes sense' is math.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top