Coding & GF(2): Understanding Logic in a Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coding
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
This came up in my logic course.

The professor writes that in GF(2), the polynomials 3xy^5 and \frac{1}{2}x^2y respectively can be reduced to 3xy and xy.

I understand that y^5=(y^2)(y^2)y=(1)(1)y=y, but also in GF(2), for any x, we have x+x=0. So it seems to me that 3xy^5 can be further reduced to just xy because we have 3xy=xy+xy+xy=0+xy=xy.

For the other, I am clueless. Sure, x^2y=xy because in GF(2), for any x, we have x²=x. But what happened to the 1/2? Worse, what is 1/2? It's the inverse of 2. And 2 is 1+1. But 1+1=0, and 0 has no inverse in a field.

What's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, just to make sure it's clear, we're talking about polynomial functions, not polynomials. The distinction is subtle, yet vital.

Secondly, x^2 \not\equiv 1; I'm not sure where you got that idea. The right fact is x^2 \equiv x.

Thirdly, 1/2 doesn't make any sense in GF(2), because as you say, it's equivalent to 1/0.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top