Coefficient of kinetic friction problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a car that stops on a level road. The car initially travels at 86 km/hr and stops within 93 m, with an acceleration of 3.0967 m/s² already determined. The user struggles to find the coefficient of kinetic friction, initially miscalculating the normal force as the product of the car's speed and gravity. It is clarified that the normal force should be the weight of the car (mass times gravity), and the kinetic friction force is what stops the car. The solution involves recognizing that mass cancels out in the equations, allowing for the calculation of the coefficient of kinetic friction without needing the car's mass.
kkowale4
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



On a level road with its brakes on, a car traveling at 86 km/hr stops within 93 m when the brakes lock and the car slides.
- a) What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the car? 3.0967 which i already found.
- b) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the pavement? ? ?



Homework Equations



kinetic friction = (coefficient of kinetic friction)( Normal force)


The Attempt at a Solution



For part B (the part i can't figure out)
86km/hr = 24m/s
24(9.8 gravity)= 235.2 Normal force
24/235.2 = .102 = coefficient of kinetic friction which is wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right equation for friction but you have misunderstood what it means.
The normal force is the weight of the car = mass * g
The kinetic friction is the friction force stopping the car. You know this because the "coefficient of kinetic friction" has no units this kinetic friction must have the same units as Normal force for the equation to balance.
You can find this from F=ma where a is the (de)acceleration of the car while it is slowing and m is the mass of the car again.
 
how can i find the normal force if i don't have the mass of the car?
 
Write out the equation - 'm' appears on both sides.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top