Coefficient of restitution in different frames of references

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the coefficient of restitution in collisions, particularly when analyzing two colliding objects in different frames of reference. A scenario is presented where two objects collide, resulting in a significant loss of kinetic energy, quantified by a coefficient of restitution of sqrt(0.9). The issue arises when the calculated velocities in the lab frame do not satisfy the conservation equations, leading to confusion about the energy calculations. It is clarified that the total momentum in the lab frame contributes to residual kinetic energy, which must be accounted for alongside the energy lost in the collision. This understanding highlights the importance of considering both momentum conservation and residual energy in collision analyses.
Roman.G
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To simplify my question I would like to use a random example (although, the issue holds regardless of the numbers you pick). Suppose two objects collide (head-on) in one dimension. The initial parameters are as follows (units are irrelevant):

m1=1;m2=2;u1=3;u2=-4;

Also, suppose that exactly 90% of the KE is lost as a result of the collision (hence, the coefficient of restitution is sqrt(0.9)). Now I can convert both velocities into the center-of-mass frame of reference, invert them, multiply by sqrt(0.9) and convert back into the lab frame of reference to get (one of the two solutions):

v1=-6.09384 and v2=-0.54692

The problem with these numbers is: if I keep everything in the lab frame of reference and plug all these numbers into these equations (where ε=0.9):

Untitled.png


their LHS is not equal to their RHS by quite a significant quantity.

What am I missing?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roman.G said:
their LHS is not equal to their RHS by quite a significant quantity.

What am I missing?
If the objects have a non-zero total momentum in the lab frame then the system as a whole will have residual kinetic energy based on total mass and velocity of the center of mass, even when the component objects have all come to rest with respect to each other. As long as mass and momentum are conserved, this kinetic energy cannot go away. The coefficient of restitution can be thought of as the fraction of kinetic energy retained during each collision above and beyond that residual amount which is always retained.

If you included that residual energy when multiplying by 0.9 then your calculations would result in an energy deficit of 0.1 times residual energy, compared with reality.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
107K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
4K