The thread centers around sharing and enjoying lame jokes, with participants contributing various humorous quips and puns. The discussion explores the nature of humor, particularly focusing on jokes that are intentionally corny or groan-inducing.
There is no clear consensus on what constitutes a "lame" joke, as participants express a range of opinions on the humor shared. Some jokes are appreciated by certain individuals while others find them lacking, indicating a diversity of taste in humor.
Some jokes rely on specific cultural references or wordplay that may not be universally understood, leading to varied interpretations among participants.
WWGD said:
I'm sure they would be charmed by your analogy.berkeman said:
Sorry, I didn't mean to be pejorative about PF members. The vast majority of my PM conversations have been good. But as with all Mentors (and probably some regular members), there are times when a PM conversation takes a turn that you did not see coming. I'd post a few examples, but the new PF software doesn't keep information archived for very long...WWGD said:
Just kidding, Berke, I cannot begin to have the patience you display.berkeman said:
It's nice to see that some goddesses like hobbits.WWGD said:
I don't get it. Mt. Rushmore is in South Dakota -- nowhere near Canada, is my point. And it faces more east than it does south. Is the meme trying to say that Wyoming or maybe Montana is supposed to be Canada?!WWGD said:
And your former presidents are remarkably limber if they can get their heads upright and serious looking while their back ends are in that position...collinsmark said:
You've been made into an honorary German. I plead license/leeway in the jokes section. Rigor elsewhere, but more of a " You know what I mean" here.collinsmark said:
No. It's just a well-known fact that British Columbians have excellent vision.collinsmark said:
Neither nor. It's a [URL='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/basics-positron-emission-tomography-pet/']pet scan[/URL].WWGD said:
Goes along with the Lab tests and the Pollygraphs.WWGD said:
I bet that is not a justified generalization allowed under the tractatus. Must pay a fine by law. Joke analytics report flunks it.fresh_42 said:
Maybe that was the bar where some physicist wrote a preprint that I once saw in grad school, about "topless bottom models."Vanadium 50 said: