This forum discussion centers around a collection of lame jokes shared by users, showcasing a variety of humor styles. Notable jokes include, "A duck walks into a pharmacy and says, 'Give me some chapstick and put it on my bill,'" and "What do you call a boomerang that doesn't work? A stick." Participants engage in light-hearted banter, with some jokes eliciting groans and laughter alike. The thread emphasizes the enjoyment of humor that is intentionally silly or absurd, appealing to those who appreciate puns and wordplay.
PREREQUISITESAnyone looking to enhance their comedic repertoire, including aspiring comedians, writers, and individuals interested in the mechanics of humor. This discussion is particularly beneficial for those who enjoy light-hearted, silly jokes and want to understand their appeal.
WWGD said:
I'm sure they would be charmed by your analogy.berkeman said:
Sorry, I didn't mean to be pejorative about PF members. The vast majority of my PM conversations have been good. But as with all Mentors (and probably some regular members), there are times when a PM conversation takes a turn that you did not see coming. I'd post a few examples, but the new PF software doesn't keep information archived for very long...WWGD said:
Just kidding, Berke, I cannot begin to have the patience you display.berkeman said:
It's nice to see that some goddesses like hobbits.WWGD said:
I don't get it. Mt. Rushmore is in South Dakota -- nowhere near Canada, is my point. And it faces more east than it does south. Is the meme trying to say that Wyoming or maybe Montana is supposed to be Canada?!WWGD said:
And your former presidents are remarkably limber if they can get their heads upright and serious looking while their back ends are in that position...collinsmark said:
You've been made into an honorary German. I plead license/leeway in the jokes section. Rigor elsewhere, but more of a " You know what I mean" here.collinsmark said:
No. It's just a well-known fact that British Columbians have excellent vision.collinsmark said:
Neither nor. It's a [URL='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/basics-positron-emission-tomography-pet/']pet scan[/URL].WWGD said:
Goes along with the Lab tests and the Pollygraphs.WWGD said:
I bet that is not a justified generalization allowed under the tractatus. Must pay a fine by law. Joke analytics report flunks it.fresh_42 said:
Maybe that was the bar where some physicist wrote a preprint that I once saw in grad school, about "topless bottom models."Vanadium 50 said: