Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread centers around sharing and enjoying lame jokes, with participants contributing various humorous quips and puns. The discussion explores the nature of humor, particularly focusing on jokes that are intentionally corny or groan-inducing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share their favorite lame jokes, such as the classic "Why did the chicken cross the road?" and variations on animal-related humor.
  • Others express differing opinions on the quality of certain jokes, with some finding them hilarious while others consider them unfunny or "lame." For example, one participant finds a specific horse joke funny, while another insists it doesn't qualify as lame.
  • A few jokes incorporate wordplay and puns, such as the "frayed knot" joke and the "super calloused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis" joke, which elicit mixed reactions.
  • There are discussions about surreal humor, with some participants questioning the nature of certain jokes and their classification as humor, such as the "fish" response to a lightbulb question.
  • Participants also engage in playful banter about the quality of jokes and the nature of humor itself, with some joking about the reactions to their contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on what constitutes a "lame" joke, as participants express a range of opinions on the humor shared. Some jokes are appreciated by certain individuals while others find them lacking, indicating a diversity of taste in humor.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific cultural references or wordplay that may not be universally understood, leading to varied interpretations among participants.

  • #13,651
DrGreg said:
I was going to post that, but I hadn't got round to it yet.
Procrastination is a good thing. It means you have got time today, plus you have something to do tomorrow.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, DrClaude and Ibix
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #13,653
DrGreg said:
I was going to post that, but I hadn't got round to it yet.
A friend of mine tells me he won an award for procrastination. He promises he's going to go and collect it any day now.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #13,654
Ibix said:
A friend of mine tells me he won an award for procrastination. He promises he's going to go and collect it any day now.
Once he gets confirmation that the award certificate has been designed and printed by the committee.

Edit: Hang on, I'm going to edit this post. Won't be long.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Ibix and BillTre
  • #13,655
From my Facebook feed -- Gotta waterproof your reporter microphone in the rainy report...

1664509315339.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #13,657
berkeman said:
From my Facebook feed -- Gotta waterproof your reporter microphone in the rainy report...

View attachment 314828
That's a dick move.

Douglas Adams and Mark Carwardine's book "Last Chance To See" recounts their troubles trying to record the sound level underwater in the Yangtze (a major reason why Yangtze river dolphins are in a book so titled) with non-waterproof microphones. They adopted the same solution as the reporter, but needed to buy some and didn't speak much Chinese. Resorting to mime got the message across, but they kept being offered contraceptive pills because "they're better".
 
  • #13,659
##\log\left(1+2+3\right) = \log\left(1\right) + \log\left(2\right) + \log\left(3\right)##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin, Ibix and jack action
  • #13,660
George Jones said:
##\log\left(1+2+3\right) = \log\left(1\right) + \log\left(2\right) + \log\left(3\right)##
I mean, it is not wrong …
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: George Jones
  • #13,661
Orodruin said:
I mean, it is not wrong …
Yesterday I showed this to a pure mathematician friend. After a few seconds he literally LOLed, so I thought I'd put it the joke thread, as other folks also might chuckle.
 
  • #13,662
berkeman said:
From my Facebook feed -- Gotta waterproof your reporter microphone in the rainy report...

View attachment 314828
Er... surely not?
 
  • #13,663
Orodruin said:
I mean, it is not wrong …
Do we not do the parentheses first? Or is this another mathematics joke I don't understand?
 
  • #13,664
(I make a meme!)

Software devs be like...

1664562633658.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, collinsmark, Ibix and 1 other person
  • #13,665
pinball1970 said:
Do we not do the parentheses first? Or is this another mathematics joke I don't understand?
The joke is that it is supposedly analagous to
$$5 \times (1 + 2 + 3) = 5 \times 1 + 5 \times 2 + 5 \times 3
$$or, to put it another way, treating ##\log(x)## as if it meant ##(log) \times (x)##. Which is false.

The more subtle part of the joke is that the overall result is actually true...
...because ##1 + 2 + 3 = 1 \times 2 \times 3## and so
$$ \log(1 + 2 + 3) = \log(1 \times 2 \times 3) = \log(1) + \log(2) + \log(3)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, Wrichik Basu, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #13,666
pinball1970 said:
Do we not do the parentheses first? Or is this another mathematics joke I don't understand?
Use logarithm laws
$$
\log(1+2+3) = \log(6) = \log(1\cdot 2 \cdot 3) = \log(1) + \log(2) + \log(3).
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and pinball1970
  • #13,667
George Jones said:
Yesterday I showed this to a pure mathematician friend. After a few seconds he literally LOLed, so I thought I'd put it the joke thread, as other folks also might chuckle.
I must admit, I giggled.
 
  • #13,668
pinball1970 said:
Do we not do the parentheses first? Or is this another mathematics joke I don't understand?
It's a very special case that happens to work. $$\begin{eqnarray*}
\ln(a+b+c)&=&\ln(a)+\ln(b)+\ln(c)\\
&=&\ln(abc)\\
\therefore a+b+c&=&abc
\end{eqnarray*}$$That's not generally true, but it so happens that 1+2+3=1×2×3 - a surprisingly simple special case. How funny that is depends on how hard you instinctively reject ##\ln(1+2+3)=\ln(1)+\ln(2)+\ln(3)## on the basis of the general rule before noticing the special case. I definitely snrked.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and George Jones
  • #13,669
Ibix said:
It's a very special case that happens to work. $$\begin{eqnarray*}
\ln(a+b+c)&=&\ln(a)+\ln(b)+\ln(c)\\
&=&\ln(abc)\\
\therefore a+b+c&=&abc
\end{eqnarray*}$$That's not generally true, but it so happens that 1+2+3=1×2×3 - a surprisingly simple special case. How funny that is depends on how hard you instinctively reject ##\ln(1+2+3)=\ln(1)+\ln(2)+\ln(3)## on the basis of the general rule before noticing the special case. I definitely snrked.
I must confess, I even put it on the calculator before I saw what was going on.
 
  • #13,670
fresh_42 said:
I must confess, I even put it on the calculator before I saw what was going on.
I must also confess, when I first saw the joke, I saw only the wrong method and didn't notice the answer was correct.
 
  • #13,671
DrGreg said:
I must also confess, when I first saw the joke, I saw only the wrong method and didn't notice the answer was correct.
Me typing it in WA literally described the thought process:

##\log(6) - \log(1)-\log(2 \ldots## wait, ##\log(1)=0## so ##\ldots \log(6)-\log(2)-\log \ldots## wait ##\log(2\cdot 3)=\log(## :oldsurprised:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
  • #13,672
This is a joke thread, but the moment begs the serious question: is 1,2,3 (permutated) the only real/complex solution to abc = a+b+c, when either of a, b, c cannot be 0?
 
  • #13,673
I knocked on the door of a B&B. The landlady opened the door and asked me what I wanted.

"I want to stay here", I said.

"Then stay there", she replied, and shut the door.

______________
As told by Tommy Cooper.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #13,674
DrGreg said:
I knocked on the door of a B&B. The landlady opened the door and asked me what I wanted.

"I want to stay here", I said.

"Then stay there", she replied, and shut the door.

______________
As told by Tommy Cooper.
Welcome to Hotel California
You didn't check in any time at all
So you can never leave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #13,675
Lol. . . . :-p

.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Borg
  • #13,676
_nc_ohc=6l2ix-rCCVEAX_mmeBI&_nc_ht=scontent-muc2-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, jack action and dextercioby
  • #13,677
_nc_ohc=mMPcZG75mPgAX98wa2D&_nc_ht=scontent-muc2-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #13,679
fresh_42 said:
That's great. Paul looks he has footwear on.
EDIT: You are probably aware but the image was supposed to represent a funeral.
Priest, grave digger, pallbearer/head mourner and deceased. The no shoes thing was denoting it was Paul.
 
Last edited:
  • #13,680
FB_IMG_16647161723615768.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen, Ibix, collinsmark and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
992
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 420 ·
15
Replies
420
Views
43K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K