Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread features a collection of science-related jokes, puns, and humorous anecdotes, primarily focusing on physics, mathematics, and engineering concepts. The discussion includes various types of jokes, some of which are derived from literature, while others are original contributions from participants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a joke about a mathematician, a dog, and a cow, highlighting the humor in knot theory.
  • Another participant introduces a joke about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in a romantic context.
  • Several jokes reference mathematical conventions, such as the use of epsilon in calculus, with some participants seeking clarification on the humor.
  • A joke about a communication between Americans and Canadians illustrates a humorous misunderstanding, with historical context provided by a participant.
  • Participants discuss the nature of jokes, including the structure of short jokes and the implications of scientific terminology in humor.
  • There are multiple jokes involving Heisenberg, with one participant noting the brevity of a specific version of the joke.
  • A humorous take on a scientific method is shared, with some participants expressing curiosity about the referenced group of scientists.
  • Another joke involves a metaphorical description of a woman's experience during childbirth, framed in scientific terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share jokes and humorous anecdotes without a clear consensus on any specific joke or concept. Some jokes prompt requests for clarification, indicating varying levels of understanding and appreciation for the humor presented.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific scientific knowledge or conventions that may not be universally understood, leading to requests for explanations. The humor often hinges on wordplay and the intersection of scientific concepts with everyday situations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in science humor, particularly in physics and mathematics, may find this collection entertaining and thought-provoking.

  • #481
Hooray, I am at the absolute top of the Bell curve!
BellCurveInsult.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EnumaElish, 256bits and fresh_42
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #482
1ecccc8212fab07772002efa6557aa50.jpg


586b8947629d89bdcd692c352680615c--psychology-jokes-psychology-student.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, EnumaElish, Demystifier and 2 others
  • #483
origin-of-dinosaurs-the-birth-of-a-dinosaur-21821242.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, Jonathan Scott, diogo_sg and 5 others
  • #484
hahahaha
 
  • #485
:biggrin:

Missing socks.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, EnumaElish, Demystifier and 5 others
  • #486
Theorist A: I'm dating the most beautiful girl!
Theorist B: Really?!
Theorist A: Yes. She can be fully described by a single parameter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman
  • #487
The life of a graduate student is described by two sets of parameters:
From appartment to department and ... from adviser to budweiser
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and fresh_42
  • #488
19554218_1075401649256785_6872153858935452885_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, Demystifier, OmCheeto and 7 others
  • #489
Forget the satellites and pictures allegedly taken from orbit. This is the most convincing argument ever:
19905389_2105709629516729_6613202927279922139_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, OCR, Demystifier and 5 others
  • #490
fresh_42 said:
Forget the satellites and pictures allegedly taken from orbit. This is the most convincing argument ever:View attachment 206766
indeed !
 
  • #491
Well, you'd think that. But have you ever wondered why does the flat Earth rest on the backs of four elephants, and not e.g. ducks, or armadillos?
The whole point of the four elephants, you see, is so that they may catch things pushed off by cats (with their trunks, doh) and put them back in.
As you can see, the flat Earth cosmology is far more robust than a layman might judge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman and Stavros Kiri
  • #492
Bandersnatch said:
But have you ever wondered why does the flat Earth rest on the backs of four elephants, and not e.g. ducks, or armadillos?
The whole point of the four elephants, you see, is so that they may catch things pushed off by cats (with their trunks, doh) and put them back in.
But everyone knows it's turtles all the way down! How good are turtles at catching things?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman and davenn
  • #493
Einstein and three of his non-science friends are discussing:
Einstein: guys I discovered recently that the fastest thing in the world is light!
Friend1: I've always thought the fastest was a fast closing door ... I can never catch it.
Friend2: Gee guys no! The fastest thing ever is thought in the brain ...
Friend3: (laughing out loud) That's bs! You guys are all wrong! The fastest thing in the world is when you have the runs*! Last time it hit me I had no time at all to either think, close the door or turn on the light! ...

*diarrhea
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, DennisN and davenn
  • #494
Ht5sYIJ.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, davenn, Borg and 2 others
  • #495
abstruse-goose.gif
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, EnumaElish, mfb and 2 others
  • #496
tumblr_ol1w8pbP6M1vjnqq2o1_400.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, EnumaElish, OCR and 2 others
  • #497
principle_of_explosion.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #498
Today's SMBC.

I love coffee, so I love this one. Note the reference to the golden ratio. Hee hee. :DD

1499957164-20170713%20(1).png

[Source: http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/espresso]

[Edit: On a more detailed reading, I suspect Mr. Weinersmith might have meant to express the "Phicetto" as \frac{\mathrm{espresso \ + \ milk}}{\mathrm{milk}} = \frac{\mathrm{milk}}{\mathrm{espresso}}, given its location on the line. His original expression would have been correct if it was on the other side of "Antoccino." "A" for effort though.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman, EnumaElish, fresh_42 and 1 other person
  • #499
collinsmark said:
I love coffee, so I love this one.
You know, the first liter is the most important!

I'll never understand that milk thingy. The tough ones don't drink milk. They eat the cow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman
  • #500
haha

upload_2017-7-14_20-9-4.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Godot_, DennisN, Stavros Kiri and 2 others
  • #502
plant cell.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Hawksteinman and Bandersnatch
  • #503
What is the unit of time measuring how long it takes light to travel from the heel to the toe of a particular space-faring comic book character?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman
  • #504
Not an answer, but something I noted:

I know how long a light-saber is, but I have never seen the time unit "saber" used anywhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman and DrGreg
  • #505
Two scientists go into a bar.
One asks for a pint of beer and the other asks for a measure of vodka.
I forget the rest.
 
  • #506
mfb said:
Not an answer, but something I noted:

I know how long a light-saber is, but I have never seen the time unit "saber" used anywhere.
Gives me an idea: Next time someone asks how tall I am, I'll answer 6ns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #507
jambaugh said:
What is the unit of time measuring how long it takes light to travel from the heel to the toe of a particular space-faring comic book character?
A buzz-year?
 
  • #508
DrGreg said:
A buzz-year?
No, a Gordon Lightfoot

(I know it's not the best joke, and probably the younger crowd won't catch the references at all.)
 
  • #510
A light-second (,-minute, -year) is a unit of length. A light-kilometer(,-meter, -foot) is a unit of time. The "light" is the respective multiplication or division by c to transpose the unit type.

Assuming Flash Gordon has a foot of length 0.98357105643045 US ft long then this time unit will be 1 nanosecond. And of course the speed of light is 1x10^9 Gordon Feet per second.

And I so declare ... <with the tune of "The wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald" playing in the background> ... that this IS the length of Flash Gordon's Feet and thus we should adopt a new standard for US measure, The Gordon Foot and the Gordon Lightfoot!
(3 Gordon Lightfeet to a Gordon Lightyard, 1/12 a Gordon lightfoot to the Gordon light inch... but we can just call it 1/12 nanoseconds. :)And since "Gordon Lightfoot" is a bit unwieldy we can just call that 1 nanosecond unit a "Flash".
"Honey, just going for cigarettes, be back in a Giga-Flash!"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hawksteinman and OCR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K