Colliding Black Holes & Einstein's Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yosty22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Neil deGrasse Tyson discusses the extreme distortion of space-time caused by colliding black holes, suggesting that such conditions might allow for a form of time travel, as indicated by Einstein's equations. The conversation highlights that light cannot escape a black hole due to the intense warping of space-time, but the merging of two black holes could create paths that theoretically lead to the past. Participants express confusion over how time dilation affects observations of black holes, noting that from a distance, it may appear that the black holes never collide. The discussion also touches on the implications of these phenomena, including the paradoxes associated with time travel and the challenges of observing events near black holes. Overall, the complexities of black hole collisions and their effects on time and observation remain a profound mystery.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4
I was watching Neil deGrasse Tyson video, in which he describes a scenario of colliding black holes. He mentions that when two black holes collide, there is a huge distortion of the space time between those two black holes as each of their even horizons intersect (i.e. each black hole has passed the others' event horizon). He says that, according to Einstein's Equations, the severely distorted space time that "there is a path you can take around two moving black holes that haven't quite collided where you can end up in the past of when you started that journey."

From what I understand, light can't escape a black hole because the space time loops back in on itself so to say so that there is no path out, making the escape velocity larger than that of light. However, when two of them collide, the space time gets even more distorted. I was wondering: how exactly is it possible that space time can be warped so severely that it can allow for a method of time travel?

Video: http://youtu.be/CAD25s53wmE

Thank you in advance for any comments.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Dr Tyson's comment came around minute 48 of the video where he was discussing a paper on black hole mergers where he inferred the author had concluded reverse time travel was a possible outcome. It was an impromptu remark about a paper he admittedly did not understand and he [or the author] may easily have drawn an incorrect conclusion. Time travel to the past presents a cornucopia of paradoxes with unknown consequences. Perhaps trapping such events behind an event horizon avoids the potential issue of paradoxes, but, also renders the hypothesis untestable.
 
Yosty22 said:
I was watching Neil deGrasse Tyson video, in which he describes a scenario of colliding black holes. He mentions that when two black holes collide, there is a huge distortion of the space time between those two black holes as each of their even horizons intersect (i.e. each black hole has passed the others' event horizon). He says that, according to Einstein's Equations, the severely distorted space time that "there is a path you can take around two moving black holes that haven't quite collided where you can end up in the past of when you started that journey."

From what I understand, light can't escape a black hole because the space time loops back in on itself so to say so that there is no path out, making the escape velocity larger than that of light. However, when two of them collide, the space time gets even more distorted. I was wondering: how exactly is it possible that space time can be warped so severely that it can allow for a method of time travel?

Video: http://youtu.be/CAD25s53wmE


Thank you in advance for any comments.

Well, I don't know. I do know that in such extreme circumstances the whole idea of time and pastpresentfuture loses all meaning. An opaque mystery, as far as I'm concerned. There is a professor at University of Col at Boulder who studies this stuff, so you might look that up.
 
just reading through & got me thinking.
wouldn't you need to take time dilation close to the black holes into account ?
the closer an object is to the event horizon the slower it would appear to an observer.

surely they could never ultimately collide as seen by an observer ?
( ok not actually SEEN but compared to the time away from the event horizons )
 
I'm not sure, but as "seen" by the observer, I don't think they would collide. It kind of confuses me reading through this again, because if you are observing it from afar, you never "see" them collide, so how would you have any sort of guess what could be happening on the inside of the possible collision?
 
oh :( didn't realize items entering a black hole needed to be observed for time dilation to be effecting them.

surely their edges could both be seen if matter was falling into them, due to gravitational lensing, or possibly other effects. aren't they theoretically supposed to emit low level heat.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top