Collisions in Center-of-Mass coordinates

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m approaches a stationary particle of mass 3m. They bounce off elastically. Assume 1D. Find the final velocities using the center of mass coordinate system.


Homework Equations


(All quantities with r or v are vectors r1 and r2 represent the vectors from the origin to each particle.)
Coordinates of the Center of mass vector.
R=\frac{m_1v_1+m_2v_2}{m_1+m_2}

Coordinates from vector 2 to vector 1
r=r_1-r_2

Inverse transformations
r_1=R+\frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2}
r_2=R+\frac{m_1}{m_1+m_2}

The Attempt at a Solution


Those equations are from my notes/book. I applied them so..
r^{CM}_1=r_1-R
and
r^{CM}_2=r_2-R

I really do not know how to solve for velocities this way. It is late and maybe I am having a brain fart but how am I supposed to use the conservation of momentum relation to find velocity if it always equals zero in this coordinate system? All I have to work with is the conservation of energy. Can anyone help me out? :(??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For starters, this equation is slightly wrong:
Xyius said:
R=\frac{m_1v_1+m_2v_2}{m_1+m_2}
Also,
Xyius said:
I really do not know how to solve for velocities this way. It is late and maybe I am having a brain fart but how am I supposed to use the conservation of momentum relation to find velocity if it always equals zero in this coordinate system?
It's not true that velocity always equals zero in the CM coordinate system. That would be inconsistent with the fact that the objects are moving relative to each other.

As a first step to solving the problem, write out the equations for conservation of momentum and conservation of energy.
 
Wow I must have been tired because the amount of errors in my original post is astounding! Firstly, I meant to write POSITION vectors in the R equation, not velocity vectors. Second, the inverse transformations are missing an "r" multiple after the term with the masses as well as a minus in the r2 expression. And THIRD I meant to say the MOMENTUM is equal to zero not velocity! Oh geez haha.
Anyway I know this following work is wrong because when I do it the normal way, v1f=-1/2v1i (If I remember correctly, I can't find my work from last night.)
[PLAIN]http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/9606/pfq.gif
The problem is, I can get the velocity of "v" which is the vector between r2 and r1, but I am confused on transforming it back to get v1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure if I'm reading your work properly - could you type it out rather than including an image? In any case, it seems like there are some variables v_i and v_f, which I'm not clear on the meanings of, so what you're doing looks incorrect.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top