Combinations n things not all different

  • Thread starter Thread starter justwild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations
justwild
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Is there any formula which gives the combinations for n things (taken r at a time, r being less than n) which are NOT ALL different?
Say you have a total of n things and in those n things you have p things identical. Then you are required to select r things (r may be less or greater than p). Then what are possible ways of selecting r?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since nobody has answered yet, I will post my less-than-ideal answer which is more of a way that you could approach it rather than a guaranteed way of getting at the right answer.

You could first ask what the number of possible ways is, if you select 0 \le k \le r of the p identical ones and (r - k) of the non-identical ones. This should give you an expression involving loads of factorials that hopefully simplifies. Then sum over k = 0 to r (or k = 0 to p, if r > p).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top