Combining Formulas for Accumulated Amount of Money

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lobotomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas Money
Lobotomy
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi
P*e^(rt) = Accumulated amount of money

Principal
e logaritm
rate
time

is for continuous compounding of rate.


F=A(((1+i)^n-1)/i)
and this one works for savings that are made frequently like every month or so but only with annual compounding of rate.

is there any way to combine these formulas and calculate the accumulated amount of money i.e. getting a formula that express continuous compounding of rate for when you deposit money X times per year.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can find the effective monthly rate with the contimnuous formula, then use that effective rate instead of the actual rate in the other formula.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top