Combining Identical LEDs: Power Increase or Not?

AI Thread Summary
Combining two identical LEDs, each with a power output of 300mW, theoretically results in a total output of 600mW, provided they are connected under the same conditions. However, the effective increase in light output may be limited by the principles of étendue, which dictate that light sources cannot be concentrated beyond certain geometric constraints. When two LEDs are placed together, their light can add up, but the maximum intensity on a surface remains unchanged. This phenomenon is due to the incoherent nature of the light emitted from the LEDs, allowing for simple addition of power without enhancing concentration. Understanding these limitations is crucial for optimizing LED configurations in practical applications.
Learned
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,


I was wondering if anyone know the physical explanation about the following:

What happens if I combine two Identical LEDs with the exact same spectral profile (eg 350-450nm with 400nm center wavelength and peak).

Assuming the total power of each LED in watts is 300mW. Will the combination of the identical LEDs make for 600mW?

If so, why?

If not, Why?


Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


As long as the power supply situation for the LEDs does not change (and therefore both LEDs have the same conditions as the single LED before), you can just add the power.
 


Thanks for the reply. I have heard from people that they are not suppose to add up- although I got no reasonable explanation for why not.

Since you say it should add up. Could you please breifly explain why?
 


Learned said:
Thanks for the reply. I have heard from people that they are not suppose to add up- although I got no reasonable explanation for why not.

Since you say it should add up. Could you please breifly explain why?


Thanks in advance
 


How you add light sources is limited by ETENDUE.

Look it up on Google..Also..Roland Winston..he's the father of this stuff..used to be at
U.of Chicago now at U. of Merced. Also, Juan Minano, Pablo Benitez, Julio Chavez in Spain have done a lot of work in this. There's a couple of books on Amazon.

Basically, area*sin(emission angle half angle) is a constant..in 2d..also called Lagrange Invariant ..this is covered well in books on Non-Imaging Optics.. also look for limits to concentration

so if you have an led without a lens emitting into 180 degrees then you can't concentrate that further. If you put another one next to it the far fields add up , but no concentration improvement possible.

Typical technology for moving flux from one place to another are CEC's (Compound Elliptical Concentrators) or CPC's (Compound Parabolic Concentrators).

I am available for consulting, btw.
 


Learned said:
Since you say it should add up. Could you please breifly explain why?
Assuming that they are not arranged in a way that the light from A hits B in a significant amount or B blocks A it in other ways (and vice versa): You have a simple incoherent addition of two light sources.

The maximal intensity on a (small) surface cannot be increased, but I don't expect that you care about that, as you mentioned the total power.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top