Combining Lenses and Mirrors: Finding the Focal Length and Image Formation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the focal length in a combination of lenses and mirrors, specifically questioning the use of a focal length of 15.0 cm instead of infinity for a plane mirror. It emphasizes the method of finding the first image formed by the front lens or mirror, which then serves as the object for subsequent optical elements. The process involves rays refracting through the lens, reflecting off the mirror, and refracting again through the lens to form a second image. It is noted that during the second refraction, the virtual image created by the mirror is treated as the object, leading to a negative object distance. The conversation seeks clarification on the correct approach to image formation in this optical setup.
stpmmaths
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=20476&stc=1&d=1252412682.jpg

Question B only

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



attachment.php?attachmentid=20477&stc=1&d=1252412682.jpg


1) Why we use f=15.0cm? Shouldn't it be f=infinity considering plane mirror have an infinity focal length?
2) Normally I do combination(lens, mirrors), firstly I will consider the front lens/mirror by finding the 1st image formed. Then the 1st image will be the object of the subsequent lens/mirror. Am I using the right method to do?
 

Attachments

  • Capture4.JPG
    Capture4.JPG
    37.5 KB · Views: 2,344
  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    19.7 KB · Views: 2,375
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help from the web?
 
Rays from the object first refract through the lens, reflect from the mirror and then again refract though the lens to from I2. During the second refraction, the object is the vertual image I1 formed by the mirror. After refection from the mirror the rays appear to be converging at a distance equal to the distance of I1 behind the mirror. Hence u is negative.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top