How can a matrix with no zero eigenvalues be used to combine solutions to PDEs?

In summary, the conversation discusses how the solution to the heat equation can be made up of a linear combination of solutions to similar equations, as long as the matrix formed by the coefficients of the equations has no zero eigenvalues. This is due to the linear independence of the columns of the matrix. The concept of a linear operator is also introduced to explain how the solution can be represented as a vector.
  • #1
Panphobia
435
13

Homework Statement



If you have the heat equation

$$u_{t}-u_{xx}=a \\ u(0,t)=b\\u(1,t)=c\\u(x,0)=d$$

Show that the solution to the above equation can be made up of a linear combination of solutions to
$$u_{t}-u_{xx}=a_i \\ u(0,t)=b_i\\u(1,t)=c_i\\u(x,0)=d_i$$
$$i=1,2,3,4$$
if the following matrix has no zero eigenvalues.
$$A =\begin{bmatrix}
a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & a_4 \\
b_1 & b_2 & b_3 & b_4 \\
c_1 & c_2 & c_3 & c_4 \\
d_1 & d_2 & d_3 & d_4
\end{bmatrix}$$

So I know that if a matrix has a zero eigenvalue, then it is singular. A matrix is only singular if it has at least two rows that are not linearly independent. Can someone give me a hint on how to continue this proof? I know that because it mentions zero eigenvalues that it has to do with linear independence, but I have no clue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Panphobia said:

Homework Statement



If you have the heat equation

$$u_{t}-u_{xx}=a \\ u(0,t)=b\\u(1,t)=c\\u(x,0)=d$$

Show that the solution to the above equation can be made up of a linear combination of solutions to
$$u_{t}-u_{xx}=a_i \\ u(0,t)=b_i\\u(1,t)=c_i\\u(x,0)=d_i$$
$$i=1,2,3,4$$
if the following matrix has no zero eigenvalues.
$$A =\begin{bmatrix}
a_1 & a_2 & a_3 & a_4 \\
b_1 & b_2 & b_3 & b_4 \\
c_1 & c_2 & c_3 & c_4 \\
d_1 & d_2 & d_3 & d_4
\end{bmatrix}$$

So I know that if a matrix has a zero eigenvalue, then it is singular. A matrix is only singular if it has at least two rows that are not linearly independent. Can someone give me a hint on how to continue this proof? I know that because it mentions zero eigenvalues that it has to do with linear independence, but I have no clue.
What can you tell about the columns of a non-singular matrix? Are they linearly independent?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Well yeah the columns are also linearly independent. That means that all of the coefficients for the problem descriptions are linearly independent. But how does that correlate to combining their solutions?
 
  • #4
Panphobia said:
Well yeah the columns are also linearly independent. That means that all of the coefficients for the problem descriptions are linearly independent. But how does that correlate to combining their solutions?
Consider the following four vectors: ##\vec {v_i}=(a_i,b_i,c_i,d_i)##, for ##i=1,2,3,4## (the columns of matrix A).
Can you write the vector ##(a, b, c, d)## as a linear combination of ##(\vec {v_i})_i##? If so, can you then concoct a linear combination of the solutions ##(u_i)_i## to the 4 equations with the ##(a_i,b_i,c_i,d_i)_i## that solves the first heat equation?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Is it necessary for those four vectors to span ##R^4##? Also is that a corollary from some theorem? That if you can write the problem description as a linear combination of other problems, then the solution can also be written as a linear combination of those other problems?
 
  • #6
Panphobia said:
Is it necessary for those four vectors to span ##R^4##?
Yes, in a n-dimensional vector space, n linearly independent vectors will span the whole space.
Panphobia said:
Also is that a corollary from some theorem? That if you can write the problem description as a linear combination of other problems, then the solution can also be written as a linear combination of those other problems?
It's the same linear operator.
Say ##T: X \to Y## is a linear operator between two vector spaces. Then if ##T\vec x_1=\vec y_1,\ T\vec x_2=\vec y_2##, the linearity of ##T## implies that ##T(c_1\vec x_1+c_2\vec x_2)=c_1\vec y_1+c_2\vec y_2##.
 
  • #7
Ohhhh ok that makes a lot of sense, thank you very much!
 
  • #8
Samy_A said:
Yes, in a n-dimensional vector space, n linearly independent vectors will span the whole space.
It's the same linear operator.
Say ##T: X \to Y## is a linear operator between two vector spaces. Then if ##T\vec x_1=\vec y_1,\ T\vec x_2=\vec y_2##, the linearity of ##T## implies that ##T(c_1\vec x_1+c_2\vec x_2)=c_1\vec y_1+c_2\vec y_2##.
So the linear operator ##T## in this case just takes in the vector of coefficients and it outputs the corresponding solution? Just wondering how the solution is a vector, it's probably a stupid question.
 
  • #9
Panphobia said:
So the linear operator ##T## in this case just takes in the vector of coefficients and it outputs the corresponding solution? Just wondering how the solution is a vector, it's probably a stupid question.
No, it's not a stupid question. The key point is that the four equations (or boundary conditions) are linear in u.
If you want, you could represent the whole setup as a linear operator from some vector space of suitable functions X to X4 (or to Y4, where Y is some other vector space of functions).
##T:X \to X^4\ : u \mapsto (u_{t}-u_{xx}, u(0,t),u(1,t),u(x,0))##.
Using the same notation as above, we then have ##Tu_i=\vec v_i## (for i=1,2,3,4), where we interpret the constants as constant functions.
Then if ##(a,b,c,d)=\sum_{i=1}^4 \lambda_i\vec v_i##,
##\displaystyle T(\sum_{i=1}^4 \lambda_iu_i)=\sum_{i=1}^4\lambda_iTu_i=\sum_{i=1}^4\lambda_i\vec v_i=(a,b,c,d)##.
But again, this representation is not so important. What is important is that the equation and boundary conditions are linear.
 

1. What is the purpose of combining solutions to PDE's?

Combining solutions to PDE's allows us to find a general solution that satisfies all given conditions and provides a complete understanding of the behavior of the system.

2. How do you combine solutions to PDE's?

The process of combining solutions involves finding a linear combination of individual solutions that satisfies the given boundary conditions. This is done by using the principle of superposition.

3. Can all types of PDE's be combined?

No, only linear PDE's can be combined. Nonlinear PDE's do not follow the principle of superposition and therefore cannot be combined in the same way.

4. Is combining solutions to PDE's the only method for solving them?

No, there are other methods for solving PDE's such as separation of variables, method of characteristics, and numerical methods. However, combining solutions is often the most efficient and effective method for obtaining a general solution.

5. Are there any limitations to combining solutions to PDE's?

Yes, the principle of superposition only applies to linear PDE's. Additionally, the solutions that are being combined must be independent of each other, otherwise the resulting solution may not be valid.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
524
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
798
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
283
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
492
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
969
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top