Combining three non linear functions into one single function

souviktor
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
combining three non linear functions into one single function...

I am performing one experiment in which I have a system output as Q which fundamentally depends on 3 independent inputs h,P,F.
i.e. Q=G(h,P,F)...where G is some function.
To quantify the dependence I varied h keeping P,F constant and got a variation in Q.

Similarly I got another experimental plot of Q vs P where h,F are constant
and also one Q vs F plot for constant h,P
I did a curve fit in MATLAB cftool and obtained some non linear functions.
The equations are of the following form
Q=a1*ln(h)+b1...P,F constant
Q=a2*P^b2+c2...h,F are constant...^ denotes exponentiation.
Q=a3*F^b3+c3...h,P are constant , ^ denotes exponentiation.
a1,a2,a3,b1,b2,b3,c2,c3 are all known constants.
what I want is to combine these three functions of h,P,F and obtain G such that Q=G(h,P,F)
any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Taylor series approach might be fruitful. Since you have equations for the 1st partial derivatives of Q with respect to each of the three variables, you can calculate higher order partial derivatives.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top