What Is Common Lead in Lead-Lead Dating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puchinita5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lead
AI Thread Summary
Common lead refers to the lead isotopes present in a sample at the time of its crystallization, as well as any lead introduced through terrestrial contamination. It differs from radiogenic lead, which is produced from the decay of heavier elements, and initial lead abundances, which represent the lead present when the sample formed. The distinction is crucial for lead-lead dating, as the ratio of radiogenic to common lead isotopes is used to estimate the age of materials like meteorites. Understanding these differences helps clarify the dating process and the potential impact of contamination on results. Common lead is essentially a combination of initial lead abundance and any additional lead from environmental sources.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Learning about lead-lead dating to determine the age of things (specifically the solar system using meteorites)... I can't seem to understand what the meaning of "common lead" is. So far the best I'm getting is that it is some sort of contaminant.

What is the relationship/difference between the common lead, radiogenic lead that was formed from decay, and initial lead abundances. Is it the same as an initial lead abundance? I'm confused.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several stable isotopes of lead, only one of which is not formed as the result of the radioactive decay of heavier elements. Lead isotopes which result from radioactive decay are called 'radiogenic'. Lead-lead dating uses the ratio of the amount of 'radiogenic' lead to the amount of 'non-radiogenic' lead to estimate age.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead-lead_dating
 
yes but in my equations we have COMMON 207, 206, and 204 Pb compared with radiogenic 207 and 206Pb and non-radiogenic 204Pb. So what is common lead? My reference states "common, the lead that was present in the sample at the time of its crystallization and the lead introduced by terrestrial contamination."

So is common lead just the abundance of initial lead combined with contamination lead? Hmm.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top