Commutator-like notation, index notation

ncs22
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are some equations in the notes on field theory I am reading with notation I have never come across before. Someone told me it was a way of ensuring that the expression was anti-symmetric. I can't find it used the same anywhere else but no explanation is provided in the notes which makes me think maybe it is just an ordinary commutator but I am not sure.


Homework Equations



The equations are...

i. $\Phi_{\mu\nu} = 2x_{[\mu}\partial_{\nu]}\phi
ii. $\Lambda^{\rho}_{\mu\nu} = 2x_{[\mu}\delta^{\rho}_{\nu]}L
iii. $\partial_{[\mu}F_{\nu\rho]} = 0

F is the electromagnetic tensor if it helps.

The Attempt at a Solution



does the first mean...

\left(2x_\mu\partial_\nu\phi - 2x_\nu\partial_\mu\phi\right)

but then what do the others mean? For the second I was thinking of ignoring the superscript index - the rho - and doing the same as with the first but then what about the third one or am I not even close?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not really.
you have to divide by the factorial of the number of terms in square brackets and then you write out all the possible permutations of the terms in square brackets (where even permutations are positive and odd permutations are negative),

so 2x_{[\mu} \partial_{\nu]} \phi=2 \frac{1}{2!} \left(x_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} - x_{\nu} \partial_{\mu} \right) \phi = \left(x_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} - x_{\nu} \partial_{\mu} \right) \phi=

not this can get much more complicated. for example in your third case you'll have 6 permutations, 3 odd and 3 even. recall a permutation is odd if it can be written as an odd number of transpositions and even if it can be written as an even number of transpositions.
 
awesome! thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top