Commutator of function of operators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutation relations of functions of operators, specifically examining the validity of the formulas [f(A),B]=[A,B]df(A)/dA and [A,f(B)]=[A,B]df(B)/dB. Participants explore these relations in the context of quantum mechanics and operator algebra, questioning their general applicability and providing specific examples.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that their teacher provided the commutation relations without proof and expresses uncertainty about their general validity.
  • Another participant suggests expanding f(A) in a power series to derive df(A)/dA and questions the truth of the relation without further assumptions.
  • Some participants note that the teacher used the commutation relation to derive the expression eAeB=eA+B+[A,B]/2, but they challenge the steps taken in that proof.
  • It is proposed that the assumption of the power series expansion being in terms of scalars may be crucial for the validity of the commutation relations.
  • One participant emphasizes that the relations hold only if the commutators [A,[A,B]] and [B,[A,B]] are both zero, indicating that this condition is necessary for arbitrary operators A and B.
  • Another participant elaborates on the series expansion and provides a detailed derivation showing how the commutation relation can be simplified under certain conditions.
  • There is a light-hearted challenge to extend the formula to product functions and functions of the form 1/f(x).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the commutation relations, with some agreeing on the necessity of specific conditions for their truth, while others remain uncertain about their general applicability. No consensus is reached regarding the overall validity of the formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the validity of the commutation relations may depend on specific assumptions about the operators involved, particularly regarding their commutation properties. The discussion highlights the complexity of operator algebra in quantum mechanics.

kini.Amith
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
According to my teacher, for any two operators A and B, the commutators
[f(A),B]=[A,B]df(A)/dA
and [A,f(B)]=[A,B]df(B)/dB
He did not give any proof.
I can easily prove this for the particular cases
[f(x),p]=[x,p]df(x)/dx
and [x,pn]=[x,p]npn-1
But I don't see how the general formula is true. I also can't find it in any textbooks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curious_mind
Physics news on Phys.org
kini.Amith said:
According to my teacher, for any two operators A and B, the commutators [f(A),B]=[A,B]df(A)/dA

I am not sure that's true.

Expand f(A) in terms of a power series. Take the derivative of that to give df(A)/dA and then check if equal. I can't see how it is without further assumptions.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
But he used this formula to prove eAeB=eA+B+[A,B]/2.
To be exact, he took [eAt,B]=[A,B]teAt in one step of the proof.
 
kini.Amith said:
But he used this formula to prove eAeB=eA+B+[A,B]/2.
To be exact, he took [eAt,B]=[A,B]teAt in one step of the proof.

Expand them out and have a look at the first term - are they equal?

To be exact the first term on LHS doesn't have t in front - yet the first term on the RHS does.

Added Later:
Wait a minute - the first term contains I which always commutes so is zero. That might be the assumption he is making - if the first term of f(A) commutes with B it may hold. I will check at get back.

Yea - the assumption he is making is the power series expansion is in terms of scalars ie f(A) = a0 + a1A + a2A^2 ... and a0, a1 etc are scalars.

I think if you insert and equate then the formula are true.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
This is only true if
$$
[A,[A,B]] = [B,[A,B]] = 0.
$$
That is, the commutator of A and B must commute with A and B for the formula to be true. In the case of x and p, their commutator is a scalar and it therefore holds. However, there is no guarantee for arbitrary A and B. The relation
$$
e^A e^B = e^{A+B + [A,B]/2}
$$
is a special case of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff_formula) for when ##[A,B]## commutes with ##A## and ##B##.
 
Just to expand a bit on the series expansion.

Expanding ##f(a)## gives
$$
f(a) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{d^n f}{da^n} \frac{a^n}{n!} \equiv
\sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n a^n
$$
and thus
$$
\frac{df(a)}{da} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n n a^{n-1} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n k_n a^{n-1}.
$$
Now, in the same way
$$
f(A) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n A^n,
$$
which implies
$$
[f(A),B] = \sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n [A^n, B].
$$
We can here make use of the commutator relation
$$
[A^n, B] = \sum_{k = 1}^n A^{n-k} [A,B] A^{k-1}
$$
to rewrite this as
$$
[f(A),B] = \sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n \sum_{k = 1}^n A^{n-k} [A,B] A^{k-1}.
$$
Now, if ##[A,[A,B]] = 0##, then
$$
A^{n-k} [A,B] A^{k-1} = [A,B] A^{n-1}
$$
and
$$
\sum_{k = 1}^n A^{n-k} [A,B] A^{k-1} = [A,B] A^{n-1} \sum_{k=1} ^n 1 = n [A,B] A^{n-1}.
$$
The expression would then simplify to
$$
[f(A),B] = [A,B] \sum_{n=0}^\infty k_n n A^{n-1} = [A,B] f'(A).
$$
The last expression is of course also equal to ##f'(A) [A,B]##, since ##[A,B]## commutes with ##A##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curious_mind and kini.Amith
Orodruin said:
This is only true if
$$
[A,[A,B]] = [B,[A,B]] = 0.
$$

Thanks a ton.
 
kini.Amith said:
Thanks a ton.

Yea - me too.

It had me scratching my head a bit as well.

Thanks
Bill
 
Heh, now show that the formula extends to product functions, and to functions of the form 1/f(x). :-p
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
502
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K