I Commutator of p and x/r: Elegant Derivation in Position Basis

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter VKint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
VKint
Messages
139
Reaction score
12
This question came up in this thread: <https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ydrogen-atom-hamiltonian.933842/#post-5898454>

In the course of answering the OP's question, I came across the commutator
$$ \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] $$
where ##r = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3)^{1/2}## and ##p_k## is the momentum operator conjugate to ##x_k##. It's easy to show that the commutator is
$$ -i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{x_k^2}{r^3} \right) $$
by working in the position basis. My question is: Is there a more elegant way (i.e., independent of basis) of deriving this commutator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that some squares are missing in the definition of r.

apart from that, a useful relation can be used

if ##[A,B]=C## and ##[A,C]=[B,C]=0## then
$$[A,f(B)]=f'(B).C$$

This can be proven from filling in the series expansion of f.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes yamata1
Yeah, it seems I typed out the question a bit too quickly :P

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes thephystudent
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
490
Replies
11
Views
980
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top