Commutator of Position and Energy

meichenl
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
This is a question about simple non-relativistic quantum mechanics in one dimension.

If the energy operator is \imath \frac{h}{2\pi}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}, then it would appear to commute with the position operator x. Then, if the energy and position operators commute, I ought to be able to find simultaneous eigenstates of them.

However, it is clear that in general the Hamiltonian does not commute with x, and in general these two operators do not have any simultaneous eigenstates.

What is wrong with my thinking? Does it make sense to think of \imath \frac{h}{2\pi} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} as the energy operator, and is that supposed to be the same as the Hamiltonian? Am I running into a problem because I am thinking on the one hand of a time-independent problem and on the other of a time-dependent one? Alternatively, is it incorrect to state that any two operators which commute must have simultaneous eigenstates?

Thank you,
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Time derivative is not a valid operator in the Hilbert space, and its commutator with x does not make sense. Normally, vectors in the Hilbert space do not depend on time. The time dependence arises only when you look at the state from different (time displaced) reference frames.

Schroedinger equation does not say that "the time derivative and the Hamiltonian are equivalent operators" It says: "the time derivative of the state vector is equal to the action of the Hamiltonian on the state vector".
 
meichenl said:
[...] if the energy and position operators commute [...]

[H,X] is usually taken to be a velocity operator.
I.e., energy and position don't commute in general.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top