Commutators of angular momentum, linear momentum squared and H

Mark_L
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}} ##, prove that ##\begin{eqnarray}
[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]&=&0\end{eqnarray}##:

[Hint: Write ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}## as the ##x##-component of the angular momentum operator and evaluate ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi##.
The results for the other components will follow by symmetry.]

Hence show that if the potential is given by ##V(|\mathbf{x}|)##, then ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{H}] = 0##:

Homework Equations



##\begin{eqnarray}\hat{\mathbf{P}}&=&-i\hbar\nabla\\
\hat{L}_x&=&y\hat{p}_{z}-z\hat{p}_{y}\\
\hat{H}&=&-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V\\
\end{eqnarray}##

The Attempt at a Solution



After some algebra just using ##[A,B]=AB-BA## and substituting the equations above,

##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3y\frac{\partial d}{\partial z}(\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})-i\hbar^3z\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})+i\hbar^3\nabla^2(z\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})-i\hbar^3\nabla^2(y\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})##

and doing all the derivatives eventually gave ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial y}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial z}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial y}{\partial z}]##

But this isn't zero so I'm definitely stuck! I checked all my working and it's definitely all correct so I'm thinking there is a different (hopefully less algebraically intensive) method.

Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark_L said:

Homework Statement



For the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}} ##, prove that ##\begin{eqnarray}
[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]&=&0\end{eqnarray}##:

[Hint: Write ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}## as the ##x##-component of the angular momentum operator and evaluate ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi##.
The results for the other components will follow by symmetry.]

Hence show that if the potential is given by ##V(|\mathbf{x}|)##, then ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{H}] = 0##:

Homework Equations



##\begin{eqnarray}\hat{\mathbf{P}}&=&-i\hbar\nabla\\
\hat{L}_x&=&y\hat{p}_{z}-z\hat{p}_{y}\\
\hat{H}&=&-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V\\
\end{eqnarray}##

The Attempt at a Solution



After some algebra just using ##[A,B]=AB-BA## and substituting the equations above,

##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3y\frac{\partial d}{\partial z}(\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})-i\hbar^3z\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})+i\hbar^3\nabla^2(z\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})-i\hbar^3\nabla^2(y\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})##

and doing all the derivatives eventually gave ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial y}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial z}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial y}{\partial z}]##

But this isn't zero so I'm definitely stuck! I checked all my working and it's definitely all correct so I'm thinking there is a different (hopefully less algebraically intensive) method.

Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.

Yes, it is zero. Things like ##\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}## are zero. Same for all of your second derivatives of coordinates. Only things like ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}## aren't zero and that's equal to 1. Aren't they? I think you've been carrying around a lot of terms you could have dropped.
 
Dick said:
Yes, it is zero. Things like ##\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}## are zero. Same for all of your second derivatives of coordinates. Only things like ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}## aren't zero and that's equal to 1. Aren't they? I think you've been carrying around a lot of terms you could have dropped.

Why are they zero?
 
Mark_L said:
Why are they zero?

Because it's the partial derivative of y taken with respect to x. In taking a partial derivative with respect to x you hold y and z fixed. So it's the derivative of a constant. I'd look back at the definition of partial derivative.
 
Okay, so what about the next part?

We have ##\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m}\hat{\mathbf{P^2}}+V##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top