Commutators of Operators and Constants: A Quantum Mechanics Exercise

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the commutators of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically for the position operator \( \hat{A} = x \) and the momentum operator \( \hat{B} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \). The commutator \( [\hat{A}, \hat{B}] \) is calculated to be \(-1\), indicating that these operators do not commute, which is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. Additionally, the commutator \( [\hat{C}, \hat{B}] \) for a constant \( \hat{C} = c \) is evaluated and found to be zero, demonstrating that constants commute with operators. This reinforces the distinction between classical and quantum mechanics, where position and momentum operators cannot be interchanged. Understanding these commutation relations is crucial for grasping the principles of quantum mechanics.
Cogswell
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ## \hat{A} = x ## and ## \hat{B} = \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} ## be operators
Let ## \hat{C} ## be defined ## \hat{C} = c ## with c some complex number.

A commutator of two operators ## \hat{A} ## and ## \hat{B} ## is written ## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] ## and is defined ## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] = \hat{A} \hat{B} - \hat{B} \hat{A}##
A common way to evaluate commutators is to apply them to a general test function.

Evaluate ## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] ##
Evaluate ## [ \hat{C}, \hat{B} ] ##

Homework Equations



The definition of a commutator

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm going to try f(x) as my tet function:

## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] = x \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} x f(x) ##

## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] = x f'(x) - x f'(x) - f(x) ##

## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] = -f(x) ##

And so removing the test function:

## [ \hat{A}, \hat{B} ] = -1 ##

And for the second question:

Evaluate ## [ \hat{C}, \hat{B} ] = c \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x) - \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x} c f(x)##

Evaluate ## [ \hat{C}, \hat{B} ] = c f(x) - c f(x) = 0##

Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's right.
You will see these things a lot in Quantum Mechanics, where the momentum operator
\hat p \propto \frac{\partial}{\partial x}
(and the proportionality factor involves the imaginary unit i and the physical constant \hbar) so that the position operator and the momentum operator can no longer be interchanged as in classical mechanics:
[\hat x, \hat p] \neq 0

Constants (complex numbers) commute with pretty much anything, which you have now shown for the special case where anything = x.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top